Monday, April 30, 2012

FOXNews.com: Attacks on US Troops Unreported?

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Attacks on US Troops Unreported?
May 1st 2012, 03:46

WASHINGTON –  The military is under-reporting the number of times that Afghan soldiers and police open fire on American and other foreign troops. 

The U.S.-led coalition routinely reports each time an American or foreign solider is killed by an Afghan in uniform. But The Associated Press has learned it does not report insider attacks in which the Afghan wounds -- or misses -- his U.S. or allied target. It also does not report the wounding of troops who were attacked alongside those who were killed. 

Such attacks reveal a level of mistrust and ill will between the U.S.-led coalition and its Afghan counterparts in an increasingly unpopular war. The U.S. and its military partners are working more closely with Afghan troops in preparation for handing off security responsibility to them by the end of 2014. 

In recent weeks an Afghan soldier opened fire on a group of American soldiers but missed the group entirely. The Americans quickly shot him to death. Not a word about this was reported by the International Security Assistance Force, or ISAF, as the coalition is formally known. It was disclosed to the AP by a U.S. official who was granted anonymity in order to give a fuller picture of the "insider" problem. 

ISAF also said nothing about last week's attack in which two Afghan policemen in Kandahar province fired on U.S. soldiers, wounding two. Reporters learned of it from Afghan officials and from U.S. officials in Washington. The two Afghan policemen were shot to death by the Americans present. 

Just last Wednesday, an attack that killed a U.S. Army special forces soldier, Staff Sgt. Andrew T. Brittonmihalo, 25, also wounded three other American soldiers. The death was reported by ISAF as an insider attack, but it made no mention of the wounded -- or that an Afghan civilian also was killed. 

The attacker was an Afghan special forces soldier who opened fire with a machine gun at a base in Kandahar province. He was killed by return fire. 

That attack apparently was the first by a member of the Afghan special forces, who are more closely vetted than conventional Afghan forces and are often described by American officials as the most effective and reliable in the Afghan military. 

Coalition officials do not dispute that such non-fatal attacks happen, but they have not provided a full accounting. 

The insider threat has existed for years but has grown more deadly. Last year there were 21 fatal attacks that killed 35 coalition service members, according to ISAF figures. That compares with 11 fatal attacks and 20 deaths the previous year. In 2007 and 2008 there were a combined total of four attacks and four deaths. 

ISAF has released brief descriptions of each of the fatal attacks for 2012 but says similar information for fatal attacks in 2011 is considered classified and therefore cannot be released. 

Mark Jacobson, an international affairs expert at the German Marshall Fund in Washington and a former deputy NATO senior civilian representative in Afghanistan, said attacks of all types are cause for worry. 

"You have to build up trust when working with partners, and years of trust can be destroyed in just a minute," Jacobson said. No matter what the motivation of the Afghan attacker, "it threatens the partnership." 

Until now there has been little public notice of non-fatal insider attacks, even though they would appear to reflect the same deadly intent as that of Afghans who manage to succeed in killing their foreign partners. 

Jamie Graybeal, an ISAF spokesman in Kabul, disclosed Monday in response to repeated AP requests that in addition to 10 fatal insider attacks so far this year, there have been two others that resulted in no deaths or injuries, plus one attack that resulted in wounded, for a total of 13 attacks. The three non-fatal attacks had not previously been reported. 

Graybeal also disclosed that in most of the 10 fatal attacks a number of other ISAF troops were wounded. By policy, the fact that the attacks resulted in wounded as well as a fatality is not reported, he said. 

Asked to explain why non-fatal insider attacks are not reported, Graybeal said the coalition does not disclose them because it does not have consent from all coalition governments to do so. 

"All releases must be consistent with the national policies of troop contributing nations," Graybeal said. 

Graybeal said a new review of this year's data showed that the 10 fatal attacks resulted in the deaths of 19 ISAF service members. His office had previously said the death total was 18. Most of those killed this year have been Americans but France, Britain and other coalition member countries also have suffered fatalities. 

Graybeal said each attack in 2012 and 2011 was "an isolated incident and has its own underlying circumstances and motives." Just last May, however, an unclassified internal ISAF study, called "A Crisis of Trust and Cultural Incompatibility," concluded, "Such fratricide-murder incidents are no longer isolated; they reflect a growing systemic threat." It said many attacks stemmed from Afghan grievances related to cultural and other conflicts with U.S. troops. 

Gen. Mohammad Zahir Azimi, spokesman for the Afghan Defense Ministry, said the army has tightened its monitoring of soldiers' activities recently and, in some cases, taken action to stop insider attacks. 

For example, "a number of soldiers" have been arrested for activity that might suggest a plot, such as providing information on army activities to people outside the military, he said. Some have been dismissed from the Army, but he did not provide figures. 

U.S. officials say that in most cases the Afghans who turn their guns on their supposed allies are motivated not by sympathy for the Taliban or on orders from insurgents but rather act as a result of personal grievances against the coalition.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: GOP Consultant on TrialIn 'Robo-Call' Fraud Case

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
GOP Consultant on TrialIn 'Robo-Call' Fraud Case
May 1st 2012, 03:00

Julius Henson, a legendary Baltimore campaign consultant who's been involved in politics for decades, took his seat Monday morning at the defense table to face trial on accusations that he tried to suppress the black vote with shady robo-calls. 

In an unusual case of allegedly deceptive and criminal political strategy, the 63-year-old veteran operative is accused of sending out a political robo-call -- an automated telephone call -- to neighborhoods with predominantly black voters in the Maryland 2010 general election. The call, according to prosecutors, wrongly implied the Democratic candidate for governor had already won. 

The calls went out to over 110,000 Democratic voters, and the recorded voice said: "Hello. I'm calling to let everybody know that Governor O'Malley and President Obama have been successful. Our goals have been met. The polls were correct, and we took it back. We're okay. Relax. Everything is fine. The only thing left is to watch it on TV tonight. Congratulations, and thank you." 

Henson was a political consultant to the campaign of former Republican Governor Robert Ehrlich in his race against the Democratic incumbent, Martin O'Malley. Prosecutors say the call's goal was to discourage black Democrats from showing up at the polls by fooling them into thinking there was no need to vote. 

When Fox News asked Henson if he had indeed tried to suppress the black vote, he was emphatic: "Absolutely not." 

As for the prosecution's allegations that he did, Henson said, "They've been talking for 18 months -- we get a chance to talk now and I think that the jurors and the judge will find the call was made, was a good call." 

Henson has claimed that "the speech clause in the Constitution says that political speech is free ... nothing in that call was not true." 

Henson also insisted that the goal of the call was to increase voter turnout, and blames his prosecution on "pure politics." 

"They just want to sensationalize it, emotionalize it and say, 'Oh Julius Henson didn't want black people to vote.' Okay, I've gotten more black people elected in this state, period, ever. And as a matter of fact, I'm known for getting turnout up. That is why the Ehrlich people hired me in the first place." 

As he arrived at court for the start of the trial, Henson's lawyer, Edwards Smith, Jr., told Fox News that his client is "not guilty." 

Smith said the purpose of the call was "to bring out votes," and that "the evidence will show that the list had no race attached to it, in fact there were plenty of whites, Chinese and others" who were called. 

But prosecutors say the call is criminal, violating the law by fraudulently attempting to interfere with voters' decisions. 

"It's not protected by the First Amendment," said Maryland State Prosecutor Emmett Davitt in February, when Ehrlich's campaign aide, Paul Schurick, was sentenced after being convicted for election fraud related to the robo-call scheme. 

"This type of behavior is more than just a dirty trick or politics as usual. It is illegal and it will be prosecuted," Davitt has said. 

Schurick maintained the call was meant to actually motivate Ehrlich supporters to go to the polls, not to keep them away.  After his sentencing in February, he said, "I believed that there were several thousand African American supporters of Bob Ehrlich who had not yet voted that day and that a call or message, as counterintuitive as it seems in hindsight, that a message such as that one would in fact motivate them to go to the polls if they had not already done so." 

The call was not successful. O'Malley, the Democrat, went on to win re-election and remains Maryland's governor. 

If you suspect voter fraud or problems at the polls tell us: VoterFraud@Foxnews.com.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Mom Desperate to Find Woman Lost in Panama

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Mom Desperate to Find Woman Lost in Panama
May 1st 2012, 01:06

An American mother searching for her daughter in Panama said Monday she's desperate for answers, while authorities name an ex-Marine a person of interest in the case.

Yvonne Baldelli, a 42-year-old California woman, was last seen near Panama's border with Costa Rica in November. She was reported missing by her family in January.

"As you can imagine, as a mom, it's very hard to leave here without Yvonne in my hand," Baldelli's mother, Lillian Faust, told FoxNews.com from her hotel in Panama. 

Faust, who was too distraught to speak about the case in detail, said Panamanian authorities are "doing everything they can" to uncover what happened to Baldelli.

The FBI confirmed to FoxNews.com that they are assisting in the search for the woman, though referred all media inquiries to authorities in Panama. 

A Panama police official told the Associated Press on Sunday that Baldelli's former boyfriend, Brian Brimager, raised the interest of investigators and is a person of interest. Panama authorities said Brimager, a former Marine, left Panama for Costa Rica and the United States some 10 days after last being seen with Baldelli in November.

On Thursday, FBI and Panamanian forensic investigators reportedly visited the hotel where Baldelli and Brimager were staying. 

Panama national police official Alexis Munoz told the AP that witnesses at the hotel reported that the couple had a "violent" relationship and frequently fought and argued.

Baldelli's mother said she had never met Brimager, who she thinks is from Southern California. She said authorities had not told them that Brimager is suspected of anything. 

"I do not know, but if he knows something I would love for him to speak," she told the AP.

Baldelli's sister, Michelle Faust, said the missing woman had gone to Panama in September to design and produce clothing to sell on the islands' beaches.

She said the family had talked with the boyfriend after he returned to the U.S., but declined to give any details of what was said.

Munoz said Brimager had worked while in Panama as a performer in bars playing guitar and singing for tips.

Baldelli's elderly grandmother, Carmine Lanausee, told FoxNews.com from her home in Rochester, N.Y., that the woman had no children.

"She only had a little puppy," said Lanausee. According to a Facebook page devoted to the search for Baldelli, the dog, named Georgia Mae, is also missing. 

A statement by family members on the page says Baldelli also had another dog that they are trying to locate. 

"Although we don't have pictures of her, we are also hoping to discover the whereabouts of Yvonne's other dog (adopted in Bocas) Monnecca," the statement read. "She is a German shepherd mix, missing along with Yvonne and Georgia Mae. 

"Yvonne's *loves* her dogs, they are her babies, finding them may bring us closer to finding her."

FoxNews.com's Cristina Corbin and the Associated Press contributed to this report. 

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Spirit Airlines' Answer to Vet Seeking Refund: 'No'

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Spirit Airlines' Answer to Vet Seeking Refund: 'No'
May 1st 2012, 00:05

After a weekend of brutal publicity over its refusal to grant a dying Vietnam vet a $197 ticket refund because his doctor forbids him to fly, Spirit Airlines issued has a simple response:

"No."

The terse, one-word retort from company spokeswoman Misty Pinson appears to have grounded any hope that Jerry Meekins, 76, of Clearwater, Fla., might get his money back. Meekins bought the ticket to Atlantic City last month so he could see his daughter before she had surgery of her own. But when his esophageal cancer left his immune system too ravaged for travel, all the airline offered him was another ticket.

"What are they going to do?" Meekins asked the Tampa Bay Times. "Fly my casket up to Atlantic City?"

"Spirit airlines is the most ruthless, uncaring airline that shows callous disregard for its customers and, frankly, [CEO] Ben Baldanza would agree with this statement about his own airline," Kate Hanni, executive director of airline watchdog group FlyersRights.org told FoxNews.com. "They are a low-cost air carrier and all they want to do is grab those revenues at all costs. But when passengers need one ounce of customer service, forget about it!"

The airline, which has angered consumer groups with its pioneering charges for carry-on baggage and $5 fee for having a boarding pass printed at the airport, claim the no-refunds approach allows the airline to pass savings on to customers.

"At Spirit, we treat all of our customers equally and with respect," the Fort Lauderdale-based carrier said in a statement Friday. "That means our non-refundable fares are non-refundable – for everyone. 

"We are very saddened to hear about Mr. Meekins' diagnosis and sincerely hope his health improves and that we have the opportunity to serve him again on his current ticket and many more flights."

Other airlines have application procedures in which customers may be able to get their money back if they can show a reasonable cause. Hanni recommended Meekins file a complaint with the Depatment of Transportation.

"If someone is ill and they have a doctor's note, airlines must refund their money," Hanni said. "That's in every airline's contract of carriage.  Interestingly enough, remember swine flu?  They don't want sick people flying due to spread of disease. And if someone is dying, they also must refund their money."

For now, there appears to be only one way for Meekins to get his refund, and it is simply too grim to contemplate. Death before or during a scheduled flight may qualify someone for a partial refund, according to Spirit's website. A death certificate is required as proof, although the carrier presumably relaxes the requirement for an in-flight death.

Meekins, a Vietnam veteran and former police officer, told the Tampa Bay Times that he couldn't understand the airline's lack of compassion.

"If they call it 'Spirit Airlines,' where is their spirit?" he asked.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Official: Yes, We Use Drones to Kill

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Official: Yes, We Use Drones to Kill
May 1st 2012, 00:05

White House counterterrorism official John Brennan publicly described how Al Qaeda targets are chosen for drone strikes, the first time the Obama administration has described the widely known practice so openly and in such detail. 

Brennan, speaking in Washington on Monday, says President Obama wants to be more transparent with the American public a year after a raid by Navy commandos killed Usama bin Laden in Abbottabad, Pakistan. 

"Yes, in order to prevent terrorist attacks on the United States and to save American lives, the United States government conducts targeted strikes against specific Al Qaeda terrorists, sometimes using remotely piloted aircraft, often referred to publicly as drones," Brennan said. 

Brennan's remarks amounted to both a defense and a public embrace of drone technology as the leading edge of the White House's clandestine war on terrorists from Yemen to Somalia. 

Brennan says targets are chosen by weighing whether there is a way to capture the person against how much of a threat the person presents to Americans. 

Targeting Al Qaeda members with lethal force by drones is legal, Brennan said, comparing it to targeting Japanese and German commanders in World War II. 

He said use of drones was ethical because "only military objectives may be intentionally targeted and that civilians are protected from being intentionally targeted." 

Brennan also called targeted strikes "wise," saying they kept both U.S. personnel out of harm's way, and that their precision munitions helped avoid civilian casualties caused by the kind of weapons dropped by jets. 

He acknowledged, however, that civilian targets had been hit. 

Brennan said in most cases, drone strikes are carried out with the cooperation of a host government. 

Brennan's comments did not directly acknowledge the CIA's covert campaign in Pakistan, which has caused friction with the Pakistani government. Pakistan on Monday condemned a U.S. drone strike that killed three suspected Islamist militants in the northwest, the first since the country's parliament demanded that Washington end the attacks two weeks ago. In the past, Pakistan had publicly condemned strikes, but privately allowed them in specific geographic "boxes," namely in the tribal areas. 

"We continue to believe, based on the information available, that the program itself is not just unlawful but dangerous," said Hina Shamsi, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's National Security Project. "It is dangerous to characterize the entire planet as a battlefield," Shamsi said. 

A protester interrupted Brennan's remarks, shouting criticisms of the drone program. Her last words as she was dragged from the conference room by a security guard were "shame on you."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Obama Denies Using Raid Anniversary to Celebrate

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Obama Denies Using Raid Anniversary to Celebrate
Apr 30th 2012, 23:06

PORTSMOUTH, N.H. –  President Obama on Monday defended a campaign ad that suggested Mitt Romney would not have ordered the bin Laden raid, as the president also described the administration's handling of the one-year anniversary as "entirely appropriate." 

Responding to a question at a press conference on whether White House attention to the anniversary might seem like "excessive celebration," Obama said it was not. And he effectively challenged Romney to "explain" himself, after Romney said in 2007 that, "it's not worth moving heaven and earth spending billions of dollars just trying to catch one person." 

Romney now says that "of course" he would have ordered the raid. 

"I'd just recommend that everybody take a look at people's previous statements," Obama said Monday, during a joint press conference with Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda. "I assume that people meant what they said when they said it." 

He continued: "I said that I'd go after bin Laden if we had a clear shot at him, and I did. ... If there are others who have said one thing, and now suggest they'd do something else, then I'd go ahead and let them explain it." 

The topic of bin Laden's death has emerged rapidly as a campaign issue in the evolving general election battle between Obama and Romney. 

Romney said earlier Monday, while speaking to reporters in New Hampshire, that he would have approved the mission. 

"Of course. Even Jimmy Carter would have given that order," Romney said, answering a reporter's question. 

Romney has clarified that 2007 quote before. 

In fact, days after he made the comment to an Associated Press reporter, Romney explained during a 2007 GOP primary debate that he would in fact pursue bin Laden. 

"Of course we get Usama bin Laden and track him wherever he has to go, and make sure he pays for the outrage he exacted upon America," Romney said. 

He added: "He will die." 

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Edwards' Paternity Scheme Outraged Ex-Aide's Wife

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Edwards' Paternity Scheme Outraged Ex-Aide's Wife
Apr 30th 2012, 23:06

GREENSBORO, N.C. –  In an emotional day of testimony, the wife of John Edwards' former aide said Monday that the politician's plan to have her husband claim paternity of Edwards' love child made her "upset" to the point of screaming -- but that Edwards stepped in to personally convince her to go along. 

Cheri Young, who took the witness stand as the Edwards trial enters its second week, described how her husband, Andrew Young, initially claimed paternity of Edwards' love child, which she said was the candidate's idea. She occasionally broke down in tears as she testified in the criminal trial of her husband's former boss. 

Young said she was in a McDonald's drive-through when her husband told her about the paternity plan. 

"The first thought in my mind was, how in the world could Mr. Edwards ask one more thing of me, of us?" she recalled. "I was mad. I was upset. Of course I said, 'Absolutely Not!' I screamed at him. I cursed at him." 

But Young said she eventually agreed to go along with the plan after a telephone conference call with her husband, Edwards and the candidate's mistress, Rielle Hunter. 

During that call, Cheri Young said Edwards went into a stump speech, explaining why his presidency would be good for the country. 

In court Monday, she described a conversation she had with her husband after the call. 

"I told him that I feel like everything had been dumped in my lap, that everyone else was on board but me," Young said. "I didn't want the responsibility of knowing that because I wasn't on board, because I didn't want to try it, the campaign would explode and I'd have to live with that." 

She said Edwards assured her that using donations to hide his pregnant mistress during the 2008 presidential campaign was legal. Young said Edwards seemed very angry during the conversation and explained he had cleared the arrangement with campaign lawyers. 

"Get the money in," she recalled Edwards saying. 

Cheri Young's testimony is important to federal prosecutors, who are trying to prove that nearly $1 million that two wealthy donors provided to hide Hunter during Edwards' run for president was intended to influence the outcome of the election. They argue the funds were "campaign contributions" and, therefore, subject to the individual donor cap of $2,300 under federal campaign finance law. 

The defense insists the gifts were private money from friends who were simply trying to spare Edwards' cancer-stricken wife from finding out about the affair. Edwards' lawyers tried to paint Young's husband as an opportunist who profited from the controversy surrounding the affair. 

But on Monday, Cheri Young spoke of the sacrifices her family made to house Hunter and shield her from an aggressive and invasive tabloid press. 

According to Young, Hunter was a high-maintenance guest. 

After living with the Youngs, Hunter moved to her own house nearby. Young said she handed Hunter a list of utility companies to call to set up new service. 

According to Young, Hunter handled the list back to her and said, "Set it up." 

She also recalled eating with Hunter at a diner in Aspen, Colo. Young said Hunter complained that her Reuben sandwich had the wrong sauce and then called her spiritual adviser and healer for help. 

Young said she and her husband wrote several checks, including one for $8,000, to help Hunter pay for her spiritual adviser's services.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Christian Teen Knew Talk by Activist Would 'Get Ugly'

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Christian Teen Knew Talk by Activist Would 'Get Ugly'
Apr 30th 2012, 22:04

By Todd Starnes

Follow Todd on Twitter

Jake Naman knew something was about to happen.

The 18-year-old from Redlands, Calif., was sitting inside a cavernous building in Seattle waiting to hear from Dan Savage, the founder of the "It Gets Better" anti-bullying campaign.

Savage had been invited to speak to several thousand high school journalists attending a national conference hosted by the National Scholastic Press Association and the Journalism Education Association.

Naman, who is a yearbook photographer at Arrowhead Christian Academy, thought Savage was going to talk about his anti-bullying campaign. But the Christian teenager soon learned that Savage had a very different message for the students.

"I hope you're all using birth control," Savage told the teenagers as he began his remarks. From there, he regaled the young people who stories about his husband, describing how he looked in a Speedo. At one point, Savage imagined what it would be like with his husband on stage – telling the kids that they would have to pry him off his partner.

FOLLOW TODD ON FACEBOOK! CLICK HERE

Naman was growing increasingly uncomfortable with the tone and tenor of Savage's remarks. There were more lewd comments, profane words and innuendo. And then, Savage said something that made Naman take notice.

"The Bible," Savage said with a elongated pause.

""The very second he said the Bible and paused, I knew it was going to get ugly," Naman told Fox News. "It was about to be a bashing."

And Naman was absolutely correct.

"We can learn to ignore the bullshit in the Bible about gay people – the same way we have learned to ignore the bullshit in the Bible about shellfish, about slavery, about dinner, about farming, about menstruation, about virginity, about masturbation," he told the young students. "We ignore bullshit in the Bible about all sorts of things."

Some will say what happened next took courage – but Naman said he was simply following the prompting of the Holy Spirit. And the entire moment was captured on a video that has now gone viral on YouTube.

The 18-year-old Eagle Scout and captain of the high school track team rose to his feet – and walked out – passing by hundreds of other students who were cheering the anti-bullying advocate's profanity-laced rant.

"I felt like in my heart I couldn't just stay there at all," he said. "It was a really weird feeling I just had to get out. I didn't want to cause a scene but I really could not stand to be in that room anymore."

Jake Naman said he felt – bullied.

"If Dan Savage had gotten up there and said 'God hates homosexuals and they're all going to hell,' there would have been huge outrage from that crowd," he said. "As Christians we get the other side of that. When our faith is attacked like that – we are ridiculed for taking a stand against it."

Naman thought that he was the only person who walked out – but when he got to the lobby – he learned that was far from the case. Arrowhead's entire yearbook staff followed his lead – including his 16-year-old sister.

"I was shaking," Julia Naman told Fox News. "I saw my brother pop up and leave and I took off after him."

So did 17-year-old Haley Mulder.

"I never felt more hurt, felt persecuted," Mulder said. "For me, my faith is what I Want to be defined by. For someone to say it was B.S. is really hurtful. I felt put down and bullied because of my faith."

And then it got worse for the Christian teenagers. Savage directly targeted them with his remarks.

"You can tell the Bible guys in the hall they can come back now because I'm done beating up the Bible," he said. "It's funny as someone on the receiving end of beatings that are justified by the Bible how pansy-assed people react when you push back."

Naman said a number of the girls began crying. He said it seemed like such a safe environment "But then Dan Savage went off and it didn't seem that way anymore."

"He had a position of power as a speaker and he was using that against a group of students who had never done anything to him," Naman said. "I would consider that bullying."

"He was completely insulting and degrading our faith," his sister said.

Mulder said Savage needed to practice what he preaches.

"I felt it was ironic coming from a person who was talking about not bullying," she said.

In all about a hundred students walked out of the speech, but Naman said many others wanted to. He said some Christian teenagers felt intimidated and were afraid of what might happen if they had left.

Still, the 18-year-old said one thing was certainly obvious – "The majority of the students did not support us at all," he said.

Savage issued a partial apology over the weekend, saying he was referring to the walk-out as "pansy-assed" and not the students. However, he stood by his profane references to the Bible.

Watch the entire video posted below:

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: EPA Official Resigns After 'Crucify' Comment Furor

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
EPA Official Resigns After 'Crucify' Comment Furor
Apr 30th 2012, 21:06

A top EPA official has resigned after coming under scrutiny for 2010 remarks in which he compared the agency's enforcement strategy to Roman crucifixion. 

Al Armendariz, the top environmental official in the oil-rich South and Southwest region, resigned in a letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson on Sunday, saying he did not want to be a distraction for the agency. The resignation is effective Monday. 

"As I have expressed publicly, and to you directly, I regret comments I made several years ago that do not in any way reflect my work as regional administrator. As importantly, they do not represent the work you have overseen as EPA administrator," he wrote. "I take great pride in having built a career based on integrity and hard work. These are the principles that guide me personally as well. While I feel there is much work that remains to be done for the people of this country in the region that I serve, after a  great deal of thought and careful consideration, I have come to the conclusion that my continued service will distract you and the agency from its important work."

Armendariz made the original remarks at a local Texas government meeting in 2010. He relayed to the audience what he described as a "crude" analogy he once told his staff about his "philosophy of enforcement." 

"It was kind of like how the Romans used to, you know, conquer villages in the Mediterranean," he said. "They'd go in to a little Turkish town somewhere, they'd find the first five guys they saw, and they'd crucify them. 

"And then, you know, that town was really easy to manage for the next few years," he said. 

Armendariz went on to say that "you make examples out of people who are, in this case, not complying with the law ... and you hit them as hard as you can" -- to act as a "deterrent" to others.

Republican lawmakers blasted him for the comments as Obama administration officials made clear the remarks did not represent the views of the EPA as a whole. Jackson said in a statement Monday that she accepted the resignation. 

"I respect the difficult decision he made and his wish to avoid distracting from the important work of the agency," she said, thanking him for his service. 

Republicans in Congress had called for Armendariz' firing, after Oklahoma Sen. James Inhofe highlighted the May 2010 speech last week as proof of what he refers to as EPA's assault on energy, particularly the technique of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking. 

Several disputed contamination cases in Texas have helped stoke environmental concerns over fracking.

Inhofe said Monday that the resignation would not stop the ongoing investigation into EPA policies. 

"We will continue our investigation into the situations surrounding EPA's apparent crucifixion victims: the American people deserve to know why, in at least three separate cases, EPA tarnished the reputation of companies by accusing them of water contamination; then when the results of their study did not turn out the way they hoped, and they had no definitive evidence to make that link, they quietly walked back their accusations. We will get to the bottom of this -- and we will continue looking into EPA's actions on hydraulic fracturing beyond these three cases as well," he said in a statement. 

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Judge Stops Texas From Cutting Off Women's Clinic

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Judge Stops Texas From Cutting Off Women's Clinic
Apr 30th 2012, 19:39

AUSTIN, Texas –  A federal judge on Monday stopped Texas from preventing Planned Parenthood from getting state funds through the Women's Health Program. 

U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel in Austin ruled there is sufficient evidence that a law banning Planned Parenthood from the program is unconstitutional. He imposed an injunction against enforcing it until he can hear full arguments. 

The law passed last year by the Republican-controlled Legislature forbids state agencies from providing funds to an organization affiliated with abortion providers. Eight Planned Parenthood clinics that do not provide abortions sued the state. The clinics say the law unconstitutionally restricts their freedom of speech and association. 

"The court is particularly influenced by the potential for immediate loss of access to necessary medical services by several thousand Texas women," Yeakel wrote in his ruling. "The record before the court at this juncture reflects uncertainty as to the continued viability of the Texas Women's Health Program." 

Texas officials have said that if the state is forced to include Planned Parenthood, they will likely shut down the program that serves basic health care and contraception to 130,000 poor women. 

The court's decision comes after the federal government cut off funding to Texas because of the state requirement. Federal officials said the rule violates federal law by restricting women from choosing the qualified medical provider of their choice. 

Texas Gov. Rick Perry promised to make up for the lost federal funds. State health officials say maintaining the program was cheaper than allowing it to expire, because ending the program would result in a spike in unplanned pregnancies among poor women who rely on Medicaid, which is also funded by the state. 

Yeakel's decision is temporary. A final decision will come after he presides over a full trial. 

Whatever decision he reaches will likely be appealed.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Wind Farms Are Warming The Earth, Research Finds

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Wind Farms Are Warming The Earth, Research Finds
Apr 30th 2012, 18:03

New research finds that wind farms actually warm up the surface of the land underneath them during the night, a phenomena that could put a damper on efforts to expand wind energy as a green energy solution.

Researchers used satellite data from 2003 to 2011 to examine surface temperatures across as wide swath of west Texas, which has built four of the world's largest wind farms. The data showed a direct correlation between night-time temperatures increases of 0.72 degrees C (1.3 degrees F) and the placement of the farms.

"Given the present installed capacity and the projected growth in installation of wind farms across the world, I feel that wind farms, if spatially large enough, might have noticeable impacts on local to regional meteorology," Liming Zhou, associate professor at the State University of New York, Albany and author of the paper published April 29 in Nature Climate Change said in an e-mail to Discovery News.

PHOTOS: Wind Power Without the Blades

'Wind farms ... might have noticeable impacts on local to regional meteorology.'

- Liming Zhou, study author

Analysts say wind power is a good complement to solar power, because winds often blow more strongly at night while solar power is only available during daytime hours. But Zhou and his colleagues found that turbulence behind the wind turbine blades stirs up a layer of cooler air that usually settles on the ground at night, and mixes in warm air that is on top.

That layering effect is usually reversed during the daytime, with warm air on the surface and cooler air higher up."The year-to-year land surface temperature over wind farms shows a persistent upward trend from 2003 to 2011, consistent with the increasing number of operational wind turbines with time," Zhou said.

FAA data shows that the number of wind turbines over the study region has risen from 111 in 2003 to 2358 in 2011, according to the study.The warming could hurt local farmers, who have already suffered through a killer drought over the past few years. Texas agriculture contributes $80 billion to the state's economy, second only to petrochemicals, according to the Texas Department of Agriculture.

West Texas is a dry area that uses irrigation to grow wheat, cotton and other crops, as well as raise cattle. But increased warming can play havoc with plant growth, as well as change local rainfall patterns.

Texas wind farms produce more than 10,000 megawatts of electricity, more than double the capacity of the nearest state, Iowa, and enough to power three million average American homes, according to the American Wine Energy Association.

NEWS: Wind Farms Float Among the Clouds

One solution could be to change the shape of the turbine blades, according to John Dabiri, director of the Center for Bioinspired Wind Energy at the California Institute of Technology who is an expert on wind power design.

"Smaller turbines can avoid this problem," Dabiri said. "However, this presents a tradeoff, because wind speed decreases as you move closer to the ground; so the smaller turbines would experience lower incoming wind speeds on average."

That means a smaller turbine makes less power.

Dabiri said Zhou's findings may mean taking a second look at the trade-offs with renewable energy. "It shows that we need to think carefully about the unintended environmental consequences of any large-scale energy development," Dabiri said, "including green technologies."

Zhou cautioned that his study used satellite data, which can have errors from clouds, for example, rather than temperature readings taken at the surface. He said he hopes to improve his dataset, and look at wind farms in other parts of the world.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Tycoon Plans to Build New And Improved Titanic

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Tycoon Plans to Build New And Improved Titanic
Apr 30th 2012, 18:03

Previous Slide Next Slide

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: One World Trade Center rises to new heights- VIDEO: NYC skyline reclaimed as 1 WTC rises- PHOTOS: World's 10 tallest buildings

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
One World Trade Center rises to new heights- VIDEO: NYC skyline reclaimed as 1 WTC rises- PHOTOS: World's 10 tallest buildings
Apr 30th 2012, 17:02

NEW YORK –  One World Trade Center, the giant monolith being built to replace the twin towers destroyed in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, will lay claim to the title of New York City's tallest skyscraper on Monday. Workers will erect steel columns that will make its unfinished skeleton a little over 1,250 feet high, just enough to peak over the roof of the observation deck on the Empire State Building.

  The milestone is a preliminary one. Workers are still adding floors to the so-called "Freedom Tower" and it isn't expected to reach its full height for at least another year, at which point it is likely to be declared the tallest building in the U.S., and third tallest in the world.

  Those bragging rights, though, will carry an asterisk.

  Crowning the world's tallest buildings is a little like picking the heavyweight champion in boxing. There is often disagreement about who deserves the belt.

  In this case, the issue involves the 408-foot-tall needle that will sit on the tower's roof.

  Count it, and the World Trade Center is back on top. Otherwise, it will have to settle for No. 2, after the Willis Tower in Chicago.

  "Height is complicated," said Nathaniel Hollister, a spokesman for The Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitats, a Chicago-based organization considered an authority on such records.

  Experts and architects have long disagreed about where to stop measuring super-tall buildings outfitted with masts, spires and antennas that extend far above the roof.

  Consider the case of the Empire State Building: Measured from the sidewalk to the tip of its needle-like antenna, the granddaddy of all super-tall skyscrapers actually stands 1,454 feet high, well above the mark being surpassed by One World Trade Center on Monday.

  Purists, though, say antennas shouldn't count when determining building height.

  An antenna, they say, is more like furniture than a piece of architecture. Like a chair sitting on a rooftop, an antenna can be attached or removed. The Empire State Building didn't even get its distinctive antenna until 1952. The record books, as the argument goes, shouldn't change every time someone installs a new satellite dish.

  Excluding the antenna brings the Empire State Building's total height to 1,250 feet. That was still high enough to make the skyscraper the world's tallest from 1931 until 1972.

  From that height, the Empire State seems to tower over the second tallest completed building in New York, the Bank of America Tower.

  Yet, in many record books, the two skyscrapers are separated by just 50 feet.

  That's because the tall, thin mast on top of the Bank of America building isn't an antenna, but a decorative spire.

  Unlike antennas, record-keepers like spires. It's a tradition that harkens back to a time when the tallest buildings in many European cities were cathedrals. Groups like the Council on Tall Buildings, and Emporis, a building data provider in Germany, both count spires when measuring the total height of a building, even if that spire happens to look exactly like an antenna.

  This quirk in the record books has benefited buildings like Chicago's recently opened Trump International Hotel and Tower. It is routinely listed as being between 119 feet to 139 feet taller than the Empire State Building, thanks to the antenna-like mast that sits on its roof, even though the average person, looking at the two buildings side by side, would probably judge the New York skyscraper to be taller.

  The same factors apply to measuring the height of One World Trade Center.

  Designs call for the tower's roof to stand at 1,368 feet -- the same height as the north tower of the original World Trade Center. The building's roof will be topped with a 408-foot, cable-stayed mast, making the total height of the structure a symbolic 1,776 feet. The U.S. Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776.

  So is that needle an antenna or a spire?

  "Not sure," wrote Steve Coleman, a spokesman for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which owns the building.

  The needle will, indeed, function as a broadcast antenna. It is described on the Port Authority's website as an antenna. On the other hand, the structure will have more meat to it than your average antenna, with external cladding encasing the broadcast mast.

  Without that spire, One World Trade Center would still be smaller than the Willis Tower in Chicago, formerly known as the Sears Tower, which tops out at 1,451 feet (not including its own antennas).

  Debate over which of those buildings can truly claim to be the tallest in the U.S. has been raging for years on Internet message boards frequented by skyscraper enthusiasts.

  As for the Council on Tall Buildings, it is leaning toward giving One World Trade the benefit of the doubt.

  "This is something we have discussed with the architect," Hollister said. "As we understand it, the needle is an architectural spire which happens to enclose an antenna. We would thus count it as part of the architectural height."

  But, he noted, the organization has also chosen to sidestep these types of disputes, somewhat, by recognizing three types of height records: tallest occupied floor, architectural top, and height to the tip.

  Hollister also pointed out that, technically speaking, One World Trade Center isn't a record-holder in any category yet, as it is still unfinished.

  "A project is not considered a building until it is topped out, fully clad, and open for business or at least occupiable," he said.

  The debate doesn't quite end there.

  Neither of the Willis Tower nor One World Trade are as high as the CN Tower, in Toronto, which stands at 1,815 feet. That structure, however, isn't considered a building at all by most record-keepers, because it is predominantly a television broadcast antenna and observation platform with very little interior space. The tallest manmade structure in the Western Hemisphere will continue to be the 2,063-foot-tall KVLY-TV antenna in Blanchard, North Dakota.

  As for the world's tallest building, the undisputed champion is the Burj Khalifa, in Dubai, which opened in 2010 and reaches 2,717 feet.

  Not counting about 5 feet of aircraft lights and other equipment perched on top, of course.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Nothing Sacred? Burglars Target Houses of Worship

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Nothing Sacred? Burglars Target Houses of Worship
Apr 30th 2012, 17:02

There's no honor among thieves -- even when it comes to stealing from churches.

A growing tide of burglaries at houses of worship are signs of both a reeling economy and the end of a social taboo that once protected the money collected to help the poor and the valuables displayed to honor a higher power. In the latest example, police in Longmont, Colo., have formed a task force to investigate 10 break-ins and attempted burglaries at six churches in less than two weeks. And all around the nation, the faithful are finding criminals unfazed by the prospect of burglarizing a sanctuary.

"From a historical standpoint, the sacredness of the church has changed, so to speak, in our society," Jeffrey Hawkins, a security consultant who works with churches. told FoxNews.com. 

Hawkins, founder and executive director of the now-defunct Christian Security Network, said churches are also more of a potentially lucrative target nowadays. The majority of churches today feature expensive multimedia components like digital soundboards, flat-screen televisions, projectors, computers and more, he said.

And they're easy pickings.

"Churches are soft targets," said Hawkins, whose organization ceased operations amid funding problems. "If you're a burglar, and you're after a flat-screen television or things like that, are you going to break into an office with alarms and locks, or are you going to go down to the church with absolutely zero security? It's an easy decision."

String of Marshall Cnty. Church Robberies: MyFoxMEMPHIS.com

The trend of breaking into churches comes as overall crime is actually decreasing.

There were 1,237 incidents of burglaries and thefts of churches in 2009, compared to 1,783 in 2010, an increase of nearly 50 percent, according to statistics compiled by Hawkins' former organization. The total cost to churches as a result of theft, burglary, robbery, vandalism and arson in 2009 exceeded $6.3 million, Hawkins said.

"From a historical standpoint, the sacredness of the church has changed so to speak in our society."

- Jeffrey Hawkins, church security expert

The FBI's Uniform Crime Report for January-June of 2011 – the most recent statistics available -- indicate that violent crime declined nationally by 6.4 percent, while burglary dropped 2.2 percent. Property crime and theft also declined by 3.7 percent and 4 percent, respectively.

Longmont Police Sgt. Sean Harper told the Longmont Times-Call that authorities have identified a suspect in the string of burglaries. But investigators do not yet want to release an image of the man taken from surveillance video at one of the churches, he said.

Cash and gift cards were stolen on April 17 from a locked safe in Longs Peak United Methodist Church after someone either forced entry or entered through unlocked doors. Church trustee Rick Nelson told the Denver Post a "very troubled soul" broke into an office where the keys to the building were stored in a metal cabinet and used those keys to break into another locked office, where the gift cards and the safe were stored inside a locked closet. The safe was not opened.

"The puzzling thing is there are no keys missing," Nelson told the newspaper, adding that the keys were placed back in the cabinet.

Other communities across the country have also experienced strings of church break-ins, most recently in Roanoke, Va., where police have responded on Monday to burglaries at four local churches. No arrests have been announced in the incidents, according to the Roanoke Times & World News

In March, police in Bossier City, La., began investigating the burglaries of three churches, including two which sustained significant property damage. Two laptop computers were also taken two churches, the Bossier Press-Tribune reports.

Investigators in Mississippi's Marshall County also probed a rash of four church burglaries within a two-week period in early in March, including one instance where thieves tried to drill open a safe in the church sanctuary.

"These [are] just working people, putting their money into this, not expecting nothing in return," Pastor Wesley Newby of Apostolic Lighthouse Church told MyFoxMempis.com.

Money the church had saved up for 9 years -- hoping to send local youth on a trip -- was stolen in the March 11 heist. Newby is now debating the cost of installing video surveillance, but said the lord forgives -- even thieves.

"He loves them, we love them," Newby told MyFoxMemphis.com. "We reach out to people like this, this is [who] we reach out [to] and people need change in their lives and God's the only one that can change it."

Two church burglaries also occurred last month in Jamestown, N.Y., and a total of eight reported thefts have occurred at churches in Waterloo and Cedar Falls, Iowa. Most of the thefts have occurred during normal operating hours, according to the Waterloo Courier.

"It looks like someone is getting in while they're open," Waterloo Police Capt. Tim Pillack told the newspaper.

Elsewhere, in Kentucky's Hardin County, five churches were burglarized in early February. Rev. Jacob Pearman of Gloryland Harvest Church in Radcliff told The News-Enterprise that the suspect broke a glass door to gain entry and took a "pretty good load," including a television, camera equipment, guitars computers and other electronic equipment.

"Years ago, virtually no one would even consider breaking into a church," Hakins said. "The perception in the United States has changed. It's not longer a safe haven."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Rights group: US, China ironing out American asylum deal for Chinese dissident

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Rights group: US, China ironing out American asylum deal for Chinese dissident
Apr 30th 2012, 15:45

BEIJING –  U.S. and Chinese officials are ironing out a deal to secure American asylum for a blind Chinese legal activist who fled house arrest, with an agreement likely before Secretary of State Hillary Clinton arrives this week, a U.S. rights campaigner said Monday.

Bob Fu of the Texas-based rights group ChinaAid said that China and the U.S. want to reach agreement on the fate of Chen Guangcheng before the annual high-level talks with Clinton and other U.S. officials begin in Beijing on Thursday.

"The Chinese top leaders are deliberating a decision to be made very soon, maybe in the next 24 to 48 hours," Fu said, citing a source close to the U.S. and Chinese governments. Both sides are "eager to solve this issue," said Fu, a former teacher at a Communist Party academy in Beijing whose advocacy group focuses on the rights of Christians in China and who maintains a network of contacts in the country.

"It really depends on China's willingness to facilitate Chen's exit," Fu said.

Chen, a well-known dissident who angered authorities in rural China by exposing forced abortions, made a surprise escape from house arrest a week ago into what activists say is the protection of U.S. diplomats in Beijing, posing a delicate diplomatic crisis for both governments.

The U.S. Embassy declined comment Monday either on Chen's situation or talks involving Assistant Secretary of State Kurt Campbell.

Both want the annual talks, known as the strategic and economic dialogue, to provide ballast to a relationship that is often rocky and to provide ways of working out disputes on trade, Taiwan, Syria, Iran and North Korea.

In a video made after Chen escaped from his village and released last Friday, the activist made no mention of wanting to go abroad. Instead he beseeched Premier Wen Jiabao to investigate the beatings, harassment and other mistreatment he, his wife and daughter suffered at the hands of local officials during 20 months of house arrest.

If Chen were willing to leave China, Washington could ill afford to turn him away. Clinton and other senior officials have repeatedly raised his case in meetings with Chinese officials. President Barack Obama is already under fire from Republicans over a case in which an aide to a senior Chinese leader entered the U.S. Consulate in Chendgu but then left, turning himself over to Chinese investigators.

The European Union has also repeatedly raised Chen's case and its office in Beijing issued a statement Monday calling for China to extend legal protections to him, his family and supporters.

"We call on the Chinese authorities to exercise utmost restraint in dealing with the matter, including avoiding harassment of his family members or any person associated with him," the statement said.

For Beijing, the issue is sensitive because Chen enjoys broad sympathy among the Chinese public for persevering in his activism despite being blind and despite repeated reprisals from local officials. And though Beijing dislikes bargaining with Washington over human rights, allowing Chen to go abroad would remove an irritant in relations with Washington. It would also prevent him from becoming a bargaining chip in an already bumpy transition of power under way from President Hu Jintao's administration to a younger group of leaders.

Fu, who has been a point of contact for people helping Chen, said he offered to help the dissident leave China through "a sort of underground railroad" shortly after he made a daring nighttime escape from his heavily guarded farmhouse on April 22. Fu had made such arrangements previously, helping the wife and two young children of another dissident lawyer, Gao Zhisheng, flee to the U.S. after they'd exited China overland from Beijing to Thailand.

But Fu said that Chen refused the offer and chose instead to go to Beijing. Despite Chen's initial resistance to exile, Fu said that might now be the only option.

"My sense is that at the end of the day, after China is willing to facilitate it in a face-saving way with the U.S., he and his family may have to choose to travel to the U.S. in whatever way that China agrees," he said.

Chen is widely admired by rights activists in China who last year publicized his case among ordinary Chinese and encouraged them to go to Dongshigu village and break the security cordon. Even Hollywood actor Christian Bale tried to visit, but was roughed up by locals paid to keep outsiders away.

A self-taught lawyer blinded by fever in infancy, Chen served four years in prison on what activists say were trumped-up charges after exposing forced abortions and sterilizations in his and surrounding villages. Since his release in September 2010, local officials confined him to his home. Amnesty International and other human rights groups say he was abused over the last 18 months.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

 
Great HTML Templates from easytemplates.com.