Wednesday, July 31, 2013

FOXNews.com: 'LIFE AS A CAPTIVE' Prosecutors: Kidnapped Ohio Women Kept Diaries

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
'LIFE AS A CAPTIVE' Prosecutors: Kidnapped Ohio Women Kept Diaries
Aug 1st 2013, 06:18

CLEVELAND –  Three women held captive in a run-down home for a decade kept diaries documenting the horrific physical and sexual abuse they suffered on a daily basis, prosecutors said Wednesday.

The women's kidnapper, Ariel Castro, lured one of them into his Cleveland home with the promise of a puppy for her son and later locked all of them in a vehicle in his garage for three days when someone visited him, prosecutors said. Castro, a former school bus driver, claimed he didn't have an exit strategy from his complicated double life and finally gave the women a chance to escape by leaving a door unlocked, they said in a court document.

One of the women broke free in May and called for help, frantically telling an emergency dispatcher, "I've been kidnapped, and I've been missing for 10 years, and I'm, I'm here. I'm free now."

Castro has pleaded guilty to 937 counts, including kidnapping, rape, assault and aggravated murder. He's being sentenced Thursday.

Cuyahoga County prosecutor Tim McGinty said in a sentencing memorandum filed Wednesday that Castro, who chained his captives by their ankles and fed them only one meal a day, "admits his disgusting and inhuman conduct" but "remains remorseless for his actions." The memorandum says many of the charges in Castro's indictment reflect conduct documented by one of the women in her diary.

In the memorandum, prosecutors describe the horrific conditions the women endured at Castro's hands. The women's diaries, they say, "document abuse and life as a captive."

"The entries speak of forced sexual conduct, of being locked in a dark room, of anticipating the next session of abuse, of the dreams of someday escaping and being reunited with family, of being chained to a wall, of being held like a prisoner of war," the memorandum says.

When Castro was arrested, his attorneys said evidence would show he wasn't a monster. The county prosecutor says the facts he'll present Thursday at Castro's sentencing, at which Castro faces life in prison plus 1,000 years, will prove the lawyers wrong.

"You'll make the same logical judgment when you see the facts," McGinty said last week after Castro pleaded guilty. "You have not seen the evidence yet."

The legal team representing the women's interests declined to comment on whether they would testify or send statements to the court. Castro's defense team had no immediate comment Wednesday.

The women disappeared separately between 2002 and 2004, when they were 14, 16 and 20 years old.

Many horrific details of the women's ordeal had already emerged, with one woman forced to wear a motorcycle helmet while chained in the basement and, after she tried to escape, having a vacuum cord wrapped around her neck.

Castro repeatedly starved and beat one of the victims each time she was pregnant, forcing her to miscarry five times.

He forced that woman on threat of death to safely deliver the child he fathered with another victim on Christmas Day 2006. That day, prosecutors say, Castro raped the woman who helped deliver his daughter.

Prosecutors will ask the judge to prohibit Castro from ever seeing his daughter, now 6.

McGinty says experts also will discuss the Stockholm syndrome to explain how Castro was able to keep the women captive for so long. The syndrome describes situations in which hostages and victims of abduction begin to sympathize with their captors and even defend them. It was named for a 1973 bank hostage situation in Stockholm, Sweden.

Castro so terrified the women that the day they were rescued, two of them were initially afraid to emerge even with five police officers in the house, McGinty said. When they did, they clung to police so tightly the officers couldn't use their flashlights, he said.

"That told me what fear this man put into these women and how much courage it took to survive this ordeal," McGinty said.

He also referred to the "mental and physical bond and barrier" that the first woman who escaped, Amanda Berry, had the courage to break.

Berry, 27, made a surprise onstage appearance at a rap concert last weekend, and a second victim, Gina DeJesus, 23, made a few televised comments as a privacy fence was erected around her house. The third victim, Michelle Knight, 32, appeared with Berry and DeJesus in a video in early July thanking the community for its support.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Filner's lawyer says San Diego should pay for legal bills due to lack of sex harassment training

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
Filner's lawyer says San Diego should pay for legal bills due to lack of sex harassment training
Aug 1st 2013, 03:23

The attorney for San Diego's embattled mayor says the city failed to provide Bob Filner state-required sexual harassment training and therefore should pay to defend him against a lawsuit by his former communications director, who alleges he asked her to work without wearing panties.

Filner's lawyer Harvey Berger made the argument in a letter to City Attorney Jan Goldsmith one day before the City Council voted unanimously to deny Filner funds for his legal defense. Local media published parts of the letter Wednesday.

Berger said the training was scheduled but the city trainer canceled and did not reschedule.

"While, to paraphrase Bob Dylan, many might argue that `you don't need a weatherperson to tell you which way the wind blows,' and an adult male should not need sexual harassment training," Filner may not be facing a lawsuit today if he had undergone the classes, Berger wrote.

"This is not an excuse for any inappropriate behavior which may have occurred, but having conducted sexual harassment training many times over the years, I have learned that many -- if not most -- people do not know what is and what is not illegal sexual harassment under California law. There is a very, very good reason for mandatory sexual harassment training; if nothing else it makes people think about the subject, and how they interact with their fellow employees," Berger wrote.

Filner is facing allegations of unwanted advances from at least eight women, including his former communications director, Irene McCormack Jackson, who filed a lawsuit July 22 against the mayor and the city. In the lawsuit, McCormack alleges Filner asked Jackson to work without panties, demanded kisses, told her he wanted to see her naked, and dragged her in a headlock while whispering in her ear.

The accusations have prompted a recall effort and a chorus of calls for Filner to resign, including from seven of nine City Council members.

Dealing a double rebuke to its mayor, the council voted unanimously Tuesday to sue Filner to require the mayor pay for any damages or attorney fees out of his own pocket if the city is held liable. It also moved to deny Filner funds for his legal defense.

"His employers, San Diego taxpayers, did not have to bail him out for the mess he created," City Councilman Kevin Faulconer said.

Under state law, Filner cannot accept more than $440 a year in donated services from his attorney, and campaign money can be used only to defend against alleged violations of the state's campaign finance law, said Ann Ravel, chairwoman of the California Fair Political Practices Commission.

He can, however, create a legal defense fund, Ravel said.

Filner, who is 70 and divorced, said Friday he would enter two weeks of "intensive" therapy Aug. 5, defying calls from his own party leaders to resign. The former 10-term congressman is less than eight months into a four-year term. He is San Diego's first Democratic mayor in 20 years.

Besides the sexual harassment allegations, Filner faces questions over a June trip to Paris that was sponsored by the Organization of Iranian-American Communities. On Wednesday, he said he would reimburse the group for his expenses, claiming it told him incorrectly that it had nonprofit status under Internal Revenue Service rules.

Filner could have accepted the trip if the group were a nonprofit.

The mayor has said the group paid $9,839 in airfare, lodging and meals, which is well above the $440 he could accept each year as a gift under state law.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Nearly four dozen reported killed in multiple church bombings by Islamic extremists in Nigeria

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
Nearly four dozen reported killed in multiple church bombings by Islamic extremists in Nigeria
Aug 1st 2013, 02:08

Almost four dozen people were killed in attacks on multiple churches in  Kano, Nigeria earlier this week in a wave of bombings the military blamed on Islamic terrorists.

The explosions Monday left 45 dead according to a report from African news service BosNewsLifehttp://global.fncstatic.com/static/v/all/img/external-link.png and seemed to indicate a spreading Islamic insurgency in the country.

Thirsty-nine bodies were recovered from the wreckage of the Christ Salvation Pentecostal Church after the attack, which occurred in the middle of a Monday night worship service. Another six bodies were found in two other area churches .

Witnesses claimed in local reports that there were another four explosions in the same Sabin Gari area, causing widespread general panic as dust and smoke hovered in the air.

The local military said the attack came from suspected members of the Islamist militant group Boko Haram, which translates into "western education is a sin." The group has been waging a war in the region for the past four years, saying it wants an Islamic state.

Boko Haram has said in the past it wants Christians to leave the predominantly Muslim area of northern Nigeria, where Kano lies.

In May, Nigeria launched a major offensive against Boko Haram  but it failed to end the terrorist attacks.

In recent weeks, at least three schools in the region were attacked by the militant group and just this past weekend, at least 20 people were left dead during a clash in the village of Dawashe.

Click here for more from BosNewsLife

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: CAN SOLAR GO SOLO? States Burned Out Over Taxpayer Subsidies

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
CAN SOLAR GO SOLO? States Burned Out Over Taxpayer Subsidies
Aug 1st 2013, 00:18

Whether it is produced on a rooftop or in the desert, solar energy is generating profits and controversy.

"We want to support renewable energy," said Hawaii state Rep. Marcus Oshiro. "But not at the expense of all the taxpayers who are heavily subsidizing this one component."

So as the industry continues to grow, a number of utilities and officials are saying it's time for solar to stand on its own – without the glut of subsidies.

When solar was a small part of the electrical grid, tax and ratepayer subsidies seemed insignificant. Advocates justified the incentives as necessary to jumpstart an upstart industry. But today, with panel prices falling 90 percent and thousands of systems being installed every week, utilities say it's time to end or unwind those subsidies.

"We cannot sustain this rate of expenditure for this one sector," said Oshiro. "It is about time they get off the training wheels and run on their own."

In Hawaii, the number of solar systems has doubled since 2007. Solar tax credits are up from $34 million in 2010 to $173 million in 2012, the year Hawaii Electric proposed a moratorium on new solar installations.

There's a similar backlash in Arizona, where the state's largest utility wants out of what it considers a regulatory nightmare, which requires non-solar ratepayers to pay solar companies 25 cents per kilowatt hour for electricity it can generate or buy elsewhere for a nickel.

"We estimate that the average rooftop solar system on an Arizona home adds $20,000 in costs for non-solar customers over its lifetime," Arizona Public Service CEO Don Brandt wrote recently in a newspaper editorial. "We believe that when all the facts are known, all parties, even owners of rooftop solar, who are today getting a very good deal, will acknowledge that the current subsidy just isn't fair to other customers."

In Los Angeles, which operates the nation's largest solar program, the Department of Water and Power put solar customers on a sliding scale, reducing by a penny a year what it will pay for excess power generated by residential solar systems.

"The good thing about local solar is it is spread out," said Los Angeles Department of Water and Power's Anh Wood. "We believe in local solar not only because it is feeding customers right where they live, but we save on electron losses from larger projects far outside the city."

In Los Angeles, solar advocates see every rooftop as a potential power plant. And the days when electricity gurus dismissed distributed solar as too expensive are over. Today, rooftop solar is seen as a competitive and significant contributor to a utility's power portfolio.

Since 2009, when 16 companies sought permits to build large scale solar plants in the deserts east of Los Angeles, nine companies cancelled or postponed their projects. By contrast, rooftop solar installations jumped by 160 percent in each of the last two years.

"Panel prices have fallen 37 percent every year for the last 10 years," said Christian Wentzel of Solar Providers, a company that leases rooftops from commercial landlords to install solar panels. The electricity is then sold to DWP or Southern California Edison.

"Solar keeps falling compared to other sources like coal and nuclear," said Wentzel. "We produce power exactly where it is needed. We produce it and sell it at a fixed rate that is good for 20 years."

The solar industry remains highly subsidized. Forced by politicians and regulators to buy renewables, utilities paid exorbitant rates for solar power on long-term contracts to meet state requirements.

As part of the 2009 stimulus, the federal government paid 30 percent of the cost of large solar project construction costs and usually loaned them the rest at below-market rates. Utilities were then forced to pay excessive prices for the power – from $130 to $200 a megawatt hour, four to eight times more than the cost of conventional power from natural gas or coal, because of state green power mandates.

Even renewable power advocates like the Climate Policy Initiative in San Francisco admit California ratepayers will be paying exorbitantly for the state's early solar contracts. Case in point: the six-square-mile Ivanpah Solar Electricity Generating System near Blythe. The $2.2 billion project's investors, Google and NRG Energy, will share a $700 million dollar tax break, according to the policy group's study, while taxpayers will pay 43 cents for every dollar of energy the plant produces.

Their study is backed up by findings from a California Public Utilities Commission report, which found renewable power cost state ratepayers $6 billion in excess costs. Stanford University economist Frank Wolak says that translates into electricity rates 10 percent to 20 percent higher than they otherwise would have been.

Solar advocates say those days are over. The industry has matured and is no longer racing to meet unrealistic green power mandates.

"Costs have come down substantially," says Wood. "We still see solar as an important part of a balanced approach."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: GOP Report: Holder Misled Congress

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
GOP Report: Holder Misled Congress
Jul 31st 2013, 23:26

House Republicans, in a lengthy report on the Justice Department's leak investigations, formally accused Attorney General Eric Holder of misleading Congress with "deceptive" testimony that he knew nothing of the "potential prosecution" of the press. 

The 70-page report was released late Wednesday by Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee. To coincide with the release, lawmakers also wrote a letter to President Obama calling for a "change in leadership" at the Justice Department. 

"The deceptive and misleading testimony of Attorney General Holder is unfortunately just the most recent example in a long list of scandals that have plagued the department," House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., said in a statement. 

The report delved into the department's aggressive investigations over various security leaks, but focused in large part on the FBI affidavit seeking a search warrant for Fox News correspondent James Rosen's emails in connection with one such probe. The DOJ sought access to the documents by arguing Rosen was a likely criminal "co-conspirator" in a leak case, citing the Espionage Act. 

Yet on May 15, shortly before the document was made public, Holder told the House Judiciary Committee that he hadn't heard of any effort to prosecute reporters. 

"With regard to potential prosecution of the press for the disclosure of material, that is not something that I have ever been involved, heard of, or would think would be a wise policy," Holder said. He discussed the issue amid concerns about the DOJ grabbing phone records from Associated Press offices. 

The newly released House report concluded that this comment was "deceptive and misleading." 

The report said: "We believe that Mr. Holder's simple and direct statement had the intended effect -- to leave the members of the Committee with the impression that not only had the potential prosecution of a reporter never been contemplated during Mr. Holder's tenure, but that nothing comparable to the Rosen search warrant had ever been executed by this administration. ... On the basis of Mr. Holder's testimony, there was little doubt in the Members' minds that the legal machinery for such an undertaking had never been started." 

Justice spokesman Brian Fallon on Wednesday said the latest report "was produced on a purely partisan basis" and said its findings "are contrary to the record and strongly disputed by many of the committee's own members." 

The Justice Department has previously explained that the investigation involving Rosen never escalated into any prosecution of the reporter. The department has acknowledged Holder had approved of the application for the search warrant, but claims his testimony before Congress was nevertheless accurate. 

The report dismissed that explanation. "We take little comfort in Mr. Holder's assurances to us now that the Department never intended to prosecute Mr. Rosen when it labeled him a criminal suspect in 2010," the report said. "Tarnishing a journalist as a suspect in a national security investigation is not something that should be taken lightly. Espionage is a serious federal crime, punishable by up to a decade in prison. In essence, the Justice Department dangled Mr. Rosen over a cliff. But the American people were then assured by Mr. Holder that this was appropriate because there was never a potential of him falling to his doom." 

The Justice Department has since completed a review of its policies for investigations involving journalists, and has called for a number of reforms. The House GOP report praised some of these efforts. But it also questioned one particular recommendation that the Privacy Protection Act of 1980 be changed so that a journalist can be targeted only when they are the focus of a criminal probe for conduct beyond normal news-gathering. 

The report claimed, though, that this was already the intent of the law. 

"Mr. Holder attempted to disguise his clearly erroneous reading of the statute as a defect in the law," the report said. "Rather than admit that he gave deceptive testimony, and that Mr. Rosen was actually a target of prosecution (and further raise the ire of the media), Mr. Holder instead represented that Mr. Rosen was never a true suspect." 

This explanation, the report claimed, served "only to provide cover for Mr. Holder's misleading testimony." 

But a department spokesman said the department has already revised its own guidelines, urging Congress to do its part. 

"Providing additional safeguards for journalists will require action by Congress. If the report's authors genuinely wish to further protect journalists, they should work to pass the bipartisan media shield legislation that the Department has already endorsed," the spokesman said. 

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: NSA program reportedly allows analysts to track emails, chats, web searches- Newly declassified documents show range of potential access to NSA phone records

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
NSA program reportedly allows analysts to track emails, chats, web searches- Newly declassified documents show range of potential access to NSA phone records
Jul 31st 2013, 22:26

The National Security Agency is operating a massive database system that allows analysts to scour individuals' emails, chats and Internet browsing histories at will, according to a new report from The Guardian based on leaked documents. 

The article was quickly challenged by the NSA. In a statement forwarded to Fox News, the agency said "allegations of widespread, unchecked analyst access to NSA collection data are simply not true." 

The agency acknowledged the existence of the program -- called XKeyscore -- but said access is limited and suggested it was mainly aimed at foreign intelligence targets. 

The Guardian article described it differently. According to the piece, the XKeyscore program is the "widest-reaching" system the agency has and allows analysts without prior authorization to dig around the database by filling out an on-screen form giving a basic justification. 

According to the report, the program covers "nearly everything a typical user does on the internet" including emails and websites visited. It also reportedly allows analysts to intercept Internet activity in "real time." 

The Guardian report seems to make a distinction between what is technically possible under this program and what is legally allowed. It notes that U.S. law requires the NSA to get a warrant if the target is a U.S. individual -- but says the XKeyscore program provides "the technological capability, if not the legal authority" to go after Americans without a warrant as long as an analyst knows information like an email or IP address. 

The NSA, in its statement, pushed back on these assertions. 

"The implication that NSA's collection is arbitrary and unconstrained is false," the agency said. "NSA's activities are focused and specifically deployed against -- and only against -- legitimate foreign intelligence targets in response to requirements that our leaders need for information necessary to protect our nation and its interests." 

The agency said those with access to the system are trained on their "ethical and legal obligations." The agency complained that the ongoing leaks continue to jeopardize security. 

The statement said the programs as a whole have helped defend the nation, and that as of 2008, "there were over 300 terrorists captured using intelligence generated from XKEYSCORE." 

The report was based on documents by NSA leaker Edward Snowden, who continues to evade capture by the U.S. 

Journalist Glenn Greenwald, who wrote the Guardian article, had claimed over the weekend that he had evidence to back up Snowden's past claims that low-level workers and other officials could tap into almost anyone's communications. 

The report comes after several intelligence officials testified Wednesday on Capitol Hill about the surveillance programs, defending them as vital to national security. 

President Obama also told Democratic lawmakers on Wednesday that he's open to some changes in NSA programs, according to those present at the meeting. 

Meanwhile, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence declassified a set of documents on Wednesday that begin to shed light on the authorization and rules behind the agency's phone and Internet record collection. 

The documents stress that these programs allow the government to collect basic information about phone calls and email communications, but not the content of those messages. They say most of the information "is never reviewed," while describing the programs as vital to the "early warning system" for detecting terror plots.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: MESSAGE DECODED 3,000-Year-Old Text Sheds Light on Biblical History

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
MESSAGE DECODED 3,000-Year-Old Text Sheds Light on Biblical History
Jul 31st 2013, 21:15

A few characters on the side of a 3,000-year-old earthenware jug dating back to the time of King David has stumped archaeologists until now -- and a fresh translation may have profound ramifications for our understanding of the Bible.

Experts had suspected the fragmentary inscription was written in the language of the Canaanites, a biblical people who lived in the present-day Israel. Not so, says one expert who claims to have cracked the code: The mysterious language is actually the oldest form of written Hebrew, placing the ancient Israelites in Jerusalem earlier than previously believed. 

"Hebrew speakers were controlling Jerusalem in the 10th century, which biblical chronology points to as the time of David and Solomon," ancient Near Eastern history and biblical studies expert Douglas Petrovich told FoxNews.com.

"Whoever they were, they were writing in Hebrew like they owned the place," he said.

"It is just the climate among scholars that they want to attribute as little as possible to the ancient Israelites."

- Doug Petrovich

First discovered near the Temple Mount in Jerusalem last year, the 10th century B.C. fragment has been labeled the Ophel Inscription. It likely bears the name of the jug's owners and its contents.

RELATED: Amazingly Untouched Royal Tomb Found In Peru

If Petrovich's analysis proves true, it would be evidence of the accuracy of Old Testament tales. If Hebrew as a written language existed in the 10th century, as he says, the ancient Israelites were recording their history in real time as opposed to writing it down several hundred years later. That would make the Old Testament an historical account of real-life events.

According to Petrovich, archaeologists are unwilling to call it Hebrew to avoid conflict.

"It's just the climate among scholars that they want to attribute as little as possible to the ancient Israelites," he said.

Needless to say, his claims are stirring up controversy among those who do not like to mix the hard facts of archaeology -- dirt, stone and bone -- with stories from the Bible.

Tel Aviv University archaeologist Israel Finkelstein told FoxNews.com that the Ophel Inscription is critical to the early history of Israel. But romantic notions of the Bible shouldn't cloud scientific methods -- a message he pushed in 2008 when a similar inscription was found at a site many now call one of King David's palaces.

At the time, he warned the Associated Press against the "revival in the belief that what's written in the Bible is accurate like a newspaper."

Today, he told FoxNews.com that the Ophel Inscription speaks to "the expansion of Jerusalem from the Temple Mount, and shows us the growth of Jerusalem and the complexity of the city during that time." But the Bible? Maybe, maybe not.

RELATED: Ancient Roman Road Found in Israel

Professor Aren Maeir of Bar Ilan University agrees that some archaeologists are simply relying too heavily on the Bible itself as a source of evidence.

"[Can we] raise arguments about the kingdom of David and Solomon? That seems to me a grandiose upgrade," he told Haaretz recently.

In the past decade, there has been a renaissance in Israel of archaeologists looking for historical evidence of biblical stories. FoxNews.com has reported on several excavations this year claiming to prove a variety of stories from the Bible.

Most recently, a team lead by archaeologist Yossi Garfinkel wrapped up a ten-year excavation of the possible palace of King David, overlooking the valley where the Hebrew king victoriously smote the giant Goliath. 

Garfinkel has another explanation as to the meaning behind the Ophel Inscription.

"I think it's like a [cellphone] text," Garfinkel told FoxNews.com. "If someone takes a text from us 3,000 years from now, he will not be able to understand it."

The writing on the fragmented jug is a type of shorthand farmers of the 10th century used, in his opinion, and not an official way of communication that was passed on.

"What's more important is that there is a revolution in this type of inscription being found," Garfinkel told FoxNews.com. There have been several from the same time period found across Israel in the past five years.

"When we find more and more of these inscriptions, maybe not until the next generation, we may have a breakthrough," he said. 

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: ALOHA, NOW LEAVE Hawaii Pols Mull One-Way Ticket Out for Homeless

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
ALOHA, NOW LEAVE Hawaii Pols Mull One-Way Ticket Out for Homeless
Jul 31st 2013, 19:22

Lawmakers in the Aloha State want to wave goodbye to their growing homeless population -- by buying them a one-way ticket off the island.

Hawaii's controversial three-year "Return to Home" pilot program launches later this year and is being billed as a way to help the state's 17,000 homeless residents, while reducing the financial burden the state has in caring for them. Under the plan, the state will pay for a one-way plane ticket for any homeless resident who can find someone on the mainland to take them in. 

The program, which has a $100,000 annual budget, is the brainchild of state Rep. John Mizuno, who had unsuccessfully tried to get a similar plan through the past three legislative sessions. This year, the measure was attached to a larger spending bill and squeaked through the state legislature.

Critics, though, say the program is a quick fix and does nothing to address the root causes of homelessness.

Patricia McManaman, director of the Department of Human Services – the agency tasked with implementing the program -- told lawmakers she had reservations about the plan to send the state's homeless away and questioned the program's funding. She also had a problem with language in the bill that suggests homeless people are in need of "sufficient personal hygiene" in order to travel – something she calls an "unnecessary and inappropriate stereotype."

But Mizuno argues it's time the state get on board with a plan that he claims can help up to 100 homeless Hawaiians a year.

In 2010, Mizuno along with state Rep. Rida Cabanilla  failed to sway lawmakers. But what they did next shocked many. Both Mizuno and Cabanilla started soliciting funds to send the homeless away anyway on a case-by-case basis. Mizuno chipped in $100 of his own money to buy a one-way plane ticket to send homeless man Gregory Reese back to Seattle, Wash.

That didn't sit well with John Fox, director of the Seattle Displacement Coalition, who told the Honolulu Star-Advertiser, he had never heard of elected officials using their own money to send a homeless person back to his or her home state.

But Hawaii's relocation plan isn't a new idea. It is fashioned after a New York City program implemented six years ago. The Mayor Michael Bloomberg-backed plan bought hundreds of homeless families bus tickets, train rides and airfare so they could leave the city. 

According to the latest figures available, New York City spent at least $500,000 annually on Project Reconnect. From 2007 to 2009, the Bloomberg administration, which has struggled with homelessness, sent more than 550 families packing. They argue that sending away families is a lot less expensive than housing them in shelters which cost the city more than $36,000 a year per family.

In Baton Rouge, La., the city's Metro Council approved a measure to send its 800 homeless residents out of the area. Officials initially named the program "Clean Sweep" but quickly changed it to the Homeless Outreach Prevent Efforts – or HOPE – after people started complaining that "Clean Sweep" seemed like the city was comparing its homeless to trash. The council approved $5,000 for the trial program which they say is enough for 30 bus tickets.

In San Francisco, you don't even need to be homeless to qualify. The city's Homeward Bound Program provides bus tickets for low-income residents who can't afford to move themselves. 

To qualify, a person must be live in San Francisco, have family of friends who will vouch to take them in, and be medically stable and sober. Personal hygiene "must be at an acceptable level to travel," although the city's Human Service Agency, which runs the program, provides clothing and shower facilities to people before they board the bus.

City commissioners in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., recently green-lighted a $25,000 program to get the homeless out of their area. Funding for The Homeless Reunification Program is taken out of the Florida Law Enforcement Trust Fund, which is made up of money confiscated by criminals

Similar programs were also started in Florida's Palm Beach County and West Palm Beach.

More than 7,000 homeless people were placed in shelters and low-income housing units in Fort Lauderdale from January-August 2011.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: MILE-HIGH BRIBERY Not 'Free' to Move About the Cabin

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
MILE-HIGH BRIBERY Not 'Free' to Move About the Cabin
Jul 31st 2013, 19:22

Getting the seat you want on a flight has never been more of a hassle.

Last year, domestic flights in the U.S. were 83 percent full, the highest passenger load factor recorded since 1945.  On top of crowded flights, most airlines have schemes in place to reserve choice seats for frequent flyers or those willing to pay a fee

Amid this atmosphere, some passengers are desperate enough to offer bribes to get their preferred seat. 

Airline employees can lose their jobs for accepting bribes, so few are willing take the risk of offering an upgrade or a better seat in exchange for a kickback. In some countries, bribes can still get you onto a full flight or in a better seat, but in the U.S., passengers who can't get their way may be stuck pulling out their wallet and approaching their fellow passengers.

While not illegal or prohibited by the airlines, passengers exchanging bribes is a concern for some who say it will create chaos in the cabin.

"It could start a trend that will be hard for the airline industry to turn off. Once the airlines start letting this happen it could cause serious problems, because inevitably there will be disputes. Where is it going to stop?

- Dr. Joyce Hunter, associate professor at Saint Xavier University

Last month, Jason Goldberg, the CEO and founder of Fab.com offered his fellow passengers $100 to swap seats in the first class cabin of a flight from Stockholm to Newark so that he and a colleague could collaborate on a work project. When they declined the offer, he vented his frustration to his 37,000 Facebook followers.

"The dude next to Bradford (his colleague) was just a jerk," he wrote. "Said he was too comfortable to move."

Reaction to the startup millionaire's rant in the blogosphere was swift and harsh. "Why should anyone move from their seat at any cost? Perhaps the person didn't think it was worth a lousy 100 bucks to give up their seat and were comfortable," posted one Facebook user on Goldberg's timeline. Others called the CEO, "entitled," and the move "revolting."

Golberg is hardly the first to offer incentives like this to fellow passengers. Last year, a couple flying with twin infants made headlines for trying a more charming approach.  Soon after boarding, they preemptively handed out goodie bags of candy to neighbors for the inconvenience of being seated next to two 14-month olds.

So what do airlines do when passengers offer each other cash or other inducements to swap seats or to get more comfortable on a flight?

We contacted United, American, Southwest and Delta and none of these airlines have a clear policy regarding passengers selling seats to each other. United said that passengers who wish to change their seating assignment should speak to a gate agent, American said they were unaware of the issue, and Southwest claimed it wasn't a problem for their passengers because they have an open seating policy.

Dr. Joyce Hunter, an associate professor at Saint Xavier University and the author of a book about air rage, said that the airlines ignore this issue at their own peril.
"It can only be bad thing for people to be haggling over seats," said Hunter, who worked in the airline industry for more than 30 years. "It could start a trend that will be hard for the airline industry to turn off. Once the airlines start letting this happen it could cause serious problems, because inevitably there will be disputes. Where is it going to stop?"

Currently, if onboard disputes arise, it's up to the cabin crew to resolve the situation. In any in-flight disagreement, if the captain considers an argument a security issue, he can have the offending passenger removed from the plane.

Heather Poole, a flight attendant for a major U.S. carrier and the author of Cruising Attitude: Tales of Crashpads, Crew Drama, and Crazy Passengers at 35,000 Feet, has seen passengers offering each other cash to switch seats without incident, and even has resorted to bribing fellow passengers herself. When she was traveling with her 3-year-old son, bought another passenger lunch and drinks in order to entice him to switch seats, so she could sit next to her child.

"If I saw someone trying to pay someone else off (to switch seats), I wouldn't interfere. I'd assume they knew each other and someone owed the other person money," said Poole.

Experts say the traveling public should expect more seat jockeying, as more travelers get stuck in middle seats or away from family members.

Andrew Thomas, an associate professor at the University of Akron and travel industry expert, said that passenger bribe attempts are an "unintended consequence" of airlines trying to squeeze more revenue from ad-on fees.

"Flying used to be a Neiman Marcus experience but now it's a Walmart experience and fading quickly," he said. "You might see people auctioning off their seats like people sell baseball tickets on Stubhub."

Yet, John DiScala, a frequent traveler and the founder of JohnnyJet.com, said paying each other for seat switches, at least in theory, isn't such as bad thing.

"If you're desperate, in this day and age, I don't know if its poor taste to offer (another passenger) money for a seat switch," said DiScala, who has never offered a bribe, but admits that he once tipped a TSA official $10 after being allowed to cut the security line when he was late for a flight.  "Some people would be happy to move for $100."

DiScala said that the best way to carve out the space you want on a flight is to simply be nice to everyone, the airline staff and your fellow passengers.

"I bring two types of chocolates with me when I travel, one for the gate agents and one for the flight attendants," he said. "I get treated like a rock star and I don't consider it to be a bribe."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Audit: Electric Cars Guzzled Tax $$

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
Audit: Electric Cars Guzzled Tax $$
Jul 31st 2013, 18:23

A California company was given more than $100 million in taxpayer funds by the federal government – with few strings attached – to establish a network of electric car charging stations that is fraught with problems, according to a government audit.

All this, despite weak demand by the American public for electric cars.

While President Obama has pledged to get 1 million electric cars on U.S. roads by 2015, a new report by the Department of Energy's inspector general found that Americans' aversion to electric vehicles and loose department supervision led to stalling the charging network – which cost taxpayers more than $135 million.

The report noted the project was filled with problems from the beginning, and said taxpayer-funded grants to San Francisco-based ECOtality for it were "very generous" and involved little risk by the company.

"The lack of analysis by the Department or ECOtality prevented us from determining whether the reasoning behind these changes was sound and in the best interest of U.S. taxpayers."

- Inspector General's report

ECOtality, which recently named Brandon Hurlbut, former chief of staff for ex-Energy Secretary Steven Chu, to its board, won a $99.8 million award in 2009 to install nearly 15,000 electric vehicle chargers throughout the country.

The company and its subsidiaries also received about $35 million from the department's Vehicle Technologies Program from 2005 to 2011, "for two multiyear projects to evaluate and test specific vehicles."

According to the Inspector General's report, ECOtality was required to kick in a minimum of 20 percent of cost sharing under the $35 million in grants, and under the $100 million award, it was to match the taxpayer subsidy. But the DOE allowed ECOtality to use monthly costs of car owners and other expenses it did not directly incur to leverage the federal funds. That meant the company took on little risk in return for its subsidies, the report said.

"Although there is no clear legislative history on the meaning behind requiring recipients to provide cost-share, the concept is generally understood to mitigate risk, help leverage federal investments, and ensure that recipients have some 'skin in the game' in these kinds of transactions," the IG report said.

ECOtality planned a full rollout of charging stations in five major metro areas to address one of the biggest problems facing the market for electric cars – "range anxiety," or fear that owners won't be able to easily charge them. The goal, according to the report, was for government to stimulate the installation of so many chargers at commercial and residential locations, that places to re-power cars would be nearly as ubiquitous as gas stations.

But weak demand for the electric cars resulted in a diminished need for chargers and the DOE and ECOtality sought to reach the 15,000-charging station goal by spreading the program to five more markets. The company also went heavier on home-chargers for individual owners and lighter on commercial stations that could serve multiple users. Those factors, according to the report, undermined the goal of easing range anxiety in the original markets.

"The real problem is the policy approach of the Obama administration," said Paul Chesser, of the National Legal and Policy Center. "The department of Energy and, really ECOtality, were in an impossible situation. President Obama says, 'There's going to be 1 million electric cars on the road by 2015, so here are billions to make it happen.' And then nobody buys the cars.

"It's a disastrous domino effect, a complication of a policy that was a bad idea," Chesser said.

Under the plan, all charging stations were to be used to gather data from users, but many commercial stations were so seldom used that they proved useless in gauging public satisfaction.

"The lack of analysis by the Department or ECOtality prevented us from determining whether the reasoning behind these changes was sound and in the best interest of U.S. taxpayers," the IG wrote.

Although the audit found "no issues with the selection of Ecotality for the project," Chesser said the company relies more on political connections than expertise in winning taxpayer grants. ECOtality began as a maker of biodegradeable products, but in 2006 jumped into the electric car industry. And the company has been upfront about its business strategy of going after government money.

"I'm a political beast," ECOtality President Jonathan Read said on a 2007 shareholder conference call. "Playing the political card is something that when the time is right we're going to play very hard."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: HEDGING THEIR BETS CNBC Rolls Dice on Star Of New Gambling Show

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
HEDGING THEIR BETS CNBC Rolls Dice on Star Of New Gambling Show
Jul 31st 2013, 18:23

CNBC may be taking a huge gamble on Steve Stevens.

Stevens, a 39-year-old Las Vegas handicapper and upcoming host of the network's "Money Talks" reality series on the world of sports gambling, runs VIP Sports in Sin City. Stevens' website boasts a winning percentage of 71.5 percent "to be exact," a figure that — to say the least — raised some eyebrows within betting circles. But Stevens' prior conviction in a telemarketing scam that bilked elderly investors of at least $234,000 nearly 15 years ago is now being scrutinized as CNBC officials begin to distance themselves from Stevens' picks.

"We are aware of Steve Stevens' 1999 conviction, and while we are very clear in the press release that VIP Sports clients risk big dollars in the hopes that Stevens and his agents have the expertise to consistently deliver winners, viewers should tune in on September 10 at 10pm ET/PT to draw their own conclusions about VIP Sports," CNBC said in a statement to FoxNews.com. "We are merely betting that viewers will be interested in the world of touts and handicappers and in no way endorse either Stevens' picks or his business model."

Stevens declined to comment when reached early Wednesday by FoxNews.com at his Las Vegas home.

"Why the [expletive] you calling here so early?" Stevens said before hanging up.

"It certainly doesn't inspire confidence for CNBC to showcase a man with this kind of checkered history."

- Howard Kurtz, media critic

The controversy surrounding Stevens — who was lauded by CNBC as a "well-known handicapper" in a July press release announcing the "docu-soap" — was first reported by Business Insider, which cited a report by WagerMinds.com that found that the domain name for Stevens' business was registered eight months ago under the name Darin Notaro.

Notaro, then 25, was sentenced to one year in jail in 1999 for his role in a Las Vegas telemarketing scheme that victimized elderly residents nationwide. As one of six men charged in connection to the Century Pacific Group, Notaro was also ordered to make $12,230 in restitution.

Notaro is also listed as the renter of the office space at 4004 Schiff Drive, the location of VIP Sports, records show.

Howard Kurtz, a Fox News media analyst, said he found the matter to be problematic.

"It certainly doesn't inspire confidence for CNBC to showcase a man with this kind of checkered history," Kurtz told FoxNews.com. "What I find particularly stunning is that the network is telling viewers to draw their own conclusions as if this were a guy who was merely controversial for his opinions as opposed to his financial shenanigans."

Kurtz continued: "By giving Stevens this platform, CNBC is implicitly vouching for him and no corporate PR statement can change that."

Todd Fuhrman, a former oddsmaker at Caesars Palace who now runs gambling site ToddsTake.com, characterized Stevens as part of a "disturbing trend" within the sports gambling world.

"We're seeing a disturbing trend start to emerge; the proliferation of docudramas, movies and articles that lead to sensationalizing dishonest personalities within the sports betting industry," Fuhrman wrote in a blog post on Monday. "The media consciously chooses to validate the wrong personalities, creating an aura around characters that are no better than modern-day carnies."

Fuhrman then noted that "no one, and I mean no one" knows Stevens, who was touted as something like a Las Vegas fixture.

"My disgust with the topic runs deeper and is with the supposedly reputable network for their half-baked attempt to do appropriate research on the featured personality," Fuhrman wrote. "Did they talk to respected voices in the field? Did they reach out to actual sportsbook operators? Did they track Stevens for at least two seasons to see if his claims were warranted before giving him his own show?"

Noted NBA gambler Bob Voulgaris, who did not return a message seeking comment early Wednesday, denounced Stevens' claim of winning more than 70 percent of his bets.

"Obviously the guy in the video is a complete scam artist," Voulgaris posted on Twitter on Monday. "70 percent? No shot."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: RETURN OF THE BEAST? Dolly Scientist Wants Woolly Mammoth Cloned

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
RETURN OF THE BEAST? Dolly Scientist Wants Woolly Mammoth Cloned
Jul 31st 2013, 16:15

The astonishingly well-preserved blood from a 10,000-year-old  frozen mammoth could lead to mammoth stem cells, said Ian Wilmut, the scientist responsible for Dolly, the world's first cloned animal -- and might ultimately lead to a cloned mammoth.

There are several hurdles to such a venture, of course, and it may ultimately prove unsuccessful.

But Wilmut's weight lends credibility to the growing possibility of bringing back the mammoth -- "de-extinction" of a long-lost species.

'If there are reasonable prospects of them being healthy, we should do it.'

- Ian Wilmut, emeritus professor at the MRC Center for Regenerative Medicine at University of Edinburgh

"I think it should be done as long as we can provide great care for the animal," Wilmut told The Guardian. "If there are reasonable prospects of them being healthy, we should do it. We can learn a lot about them," he said.

In an essay on The Conversation, Wilmut spelled out the two main methods for turning an ancient pile of mammoth bones and blood into a living, breathing creature. The two he focused on were the use of elephant eggs to grow an embryo -- similar to the process that led to Dolly -- and the creation of embryonic mammoth stem cells.

"Stem cells of this type can also be induced to form gametes. If the cells were from a female, this might provide an alternative source of eggs for use in research, and perhaps in breeding, including the cloning of mammoths," Wilmut wrote.

Wilmut, emeritus professor at the MRC Center for Regenerative Medicine at University of Edinburgh, made headlines in 1996 when he and his colleagues cloned Dolly the sheep. Their technique involved injecting DNA into a special egg cell and transferring the product into a third sheep, which carried the egg to term. While Dolly lived a brief life, dying in 2003, her very existence was hailed as a medical marvel.

That such a noted scientist could even discuss the process of bringing back the mammoth stems from an astonishing find on a remote Russian island in the Arctic Ocean: blood so well preserved that it flowed freely from a 10,000- to 15,000-year-old creature.

"The fragments of muscle tissues, which we've found out of the body, have a natural red color of fresh meat. The reason for such preservation is that the lower part of the body was underlying in pure ice, and the upper part was found in the middle of tundra," said Semyon Grigoriev, the head of the expedition and chairman of the Mammoth Museum, after announcing the discovery.

Wooly mammoths are thought to have died out around 10,000 years ago, although scientists think small groups of them lived longer in Alaska and on Russia's Wrangel Island off the Siberian coast.

A growing chorus of scientists have been targeting the mammoth for so called "de-extinction" in recent years, at the same time that others argue against tampering with Mother Nature's plans. Bringing back a dead species raises a host of issues, wrote two ethicists recently.

"The critical ethical issue in re-creating extinct species, or in creating new kinds of animals, is to first determine through careful scientific study what is in their interests and to ensure that they live good lives in the world in which they are create," wrote Julian Savulescu, who studies ethics at Monash University, and Russell Powell, a philosophy professor at Boston University.

"If we are confident that a cognitively sophisticated organism, such as a mammoth, would lead a good life, this may provide moral reasons to create it — whether or not that animal is a clone of a member of an extinct lineage."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: SUSPENSIONS LOOM Report: MLB Tells Union Which Players Face Penalty

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
SUSPENSIONS LOOM Report: MLB Tells Union Which Players Face Penalty
Jul 31st 2013, 13:04

NEW YORK –  Major League Baseball has told the union which players it intends to suspend in its drug investigation and which ones will receive lengthier penalties for their roles in the Biogenesis case, two people familiar with the talks told The Associated Press.

The sides are trying to reach as many agreements as possible that would avoid grievance hearings, and talks could push back an announcement until Friday.

The meeting between MLB and the union on Tuesday, first reported by the New York Daily News, signaled the final stretch of talks. MLB hopes to announce the penalties for all players involved at the same time, both people said, speaking on condition of anonymity because no announcements were authorized.

Three-time MVP Alex Rodriguez of the New York Yankees stands to receive the longest suspension. While 50 games is the standard for a first offense, the stiffer penalties for some players are tied to other alleged violations, including not being truthful to MLB investigators.

"The frank reality is that I do not know what is going to happen with Jhonny [Peralta], but with this move, we now feel well protected if there is a long suspension"

- David Dombrowski, Tigers GM

While MLB folks hold out hope Rodriguez will agree to a lesser sentence in return for not appealing a penalty, they have received little indication he is prepared to actually do so — even as the other plea deals would further bolster the credibility of star witness (and Biogenesis owner) Anthony Bosch. Commissioner Bud Selig has contemplated issuing a lifetime sentence, yet that would be difficult to support in front of an arbitrator, as Rodriguez is currently viewed as a zero-time offender. A ban of Rodriguez through 2014 appears more likely, The New York Post reported.

Three 2013 All-Stars could face bans: Texas outfielder Nelson Cruz, San Diego shortstop Everth Cabrera and Detroit shortstop Jhonny Peralta. In a sign Peralta's suspension might be imminent, the Tigers acquired shortstop Jose Iglesias from Boston on Tuesday night as part of a three-way trade with the Chicago White Sox.

"The frank reality is that I do not know what is going to happen with Jhonny, but with this move, we now feel well protected if there is a long suspension," Tigers general manager David Dombrowski said.

Another 2013 All-Star, Oakland pitcher Bartolo Colon, was suspended last year following a positive testosterone test, as were Toronto outfielder Melky Cabrera and San Diego catcher Yasmani Grandal. They won't receive additional discipline for that violation, the two people said.

Yankees catcher Francisco Cervelli and Seattle catcher Jesus Montero also have been linked in media reports to Biogenesis, a closed Florida anti-aging clinic that was accused by Miami New Times in January of distributing banned performing-enhancing drugs.

Melky Cabrera was the 2012 All-Star game MVP while with San Francisco and Colon won the 2005 AL Cy Young Award with the Los Angeles Angels.

Players who don't reach agreements can ask the players' association to file grievances, which would lead to hearings before arbitrator Fredric Horowitz. Discipline for first offenders under the drug agreement usually is not announced until after the penalty is upheld, but there is an exception when the conduct leading to the discipline already has been made public.

In addition, MLB may try to suspend Rodriguez under its collective bargaining agreement instead of its drug rules, which would lead to the suspension starting before the appeal.

Milwaukee outfielder Ryan Braun was the first player to reach an agreement with MLB. The 2011 NL MVP accepted a season-ending 65-game suspension last week. Braun tested positive for elevated testosterone in October 2011 but a 50-game suspension was overturned the following February by an arbitrator who ruled Braun's urine sample was handled improperly.

Rodriguez faces the harshest penalty. The Yankees expected him to be accused of recruiting other athletes for the clinic, attempting to obstruct MLB's investigation, and not being truthful with MLB in the past when he discussed his relationship with Dr. Anthony Galea, who pleaded guilty two years ago to a federal charge of bringing unapproved drugs into the United States from Canada.

"A-Rod was my teammate in New York. I'm glad he was my teammate," retired pitcher Roger Clemens said Tuesday in Boston, where he was at Fenway Park to mark the 25th anniversary of manager Joe Morgan's team that won the 1988 AL East title.

"I did things to make him feel comfortable. I did that for all of my teammates," Clemens said. "I think I was a pretty solid teammate."

The seven-time Cy Young Award winner was acquitted last year of federal charges he lied to Congress when he said he didn't take steroids or human growth hormone.

Clemens would not give his thoughts on MLB's Biogenesis investigation.

"I've got my own feelings on particular people in MLB, you know, how they approached my situation," he said. "I don't know about it, and I don't care about it, to tell you the truth."

The Associated Press contributed to this report

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

 
Great HTML Templates from easytemplates.com.