Wednesday, October 31, 2012

FOXNews.com: Fares Waived as Some NY Transit Service Resumes

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Fares Waived as Some NY Transit Service Resumes
Nov 1st 2012, 06:45

Two days after a paralyzing flood, officials announced plans Wednesday to open the undamaged parts of the massive subway and suburban rail systems that are so essential to life in New York City.

The city's transit headaches, though, are far from over.

With some subway tunnels and stations still filled with water and power still off in downtown Manhattan, big gaps will remain in the nation's largest public transit system even after the subways start rolling again Thursday morning.

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said there will be no subway service in Manhattan south of 34th Street, an area that includes the city's financial district and many tourist sites.

Commuters who would normally zoom beneath the East River in tunnels that flooded will have to disembark in Brooklyn or Queens and take shuttle buses across a handful of bridges, adding to the enormous stress already being placed on gridlocked Manhattan streets. Around 330 buses were being put into service for the task, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority said.

"We are going to need some patience and some tolerance," Cuomo said.

But the restarting of parts of the system was sure to breathe life back into the city, and allow millions of people to finally get to their jobs, or to school, for the first time since the system shut down Sunday.

To make life a little easier, Cuomo said fares would be waived on the city's subways and buses and suburban trains through Friday.

Limited service resumed Wednesday on two of the city's vital commuter rail systems, Metro-North and the Long Island Rail Road.

Both of those rail systems, which extend many miles into the Connecticut and Long Island suburbs, had been knocked out by power failures, toppled trees, and, in the case of the LIRR, flooding in tunnels beneath the East River.

Grand Central quietly reopened its doors at 2 p.m. with a handful of trains headed to suburban Westchester County.

Banker Mike Brabant took the chance to flee Manhattan, where he had been stranded on a friend's couch since Sunday, when the trains halted in advance of the storm. Pulling a suitcase, he rushed to catch a 2:25 p.m. train for home in Harrison, N.Y.

"There's still no power there, so I have to deal with that," the 51-year old said. "I'll be glad to be back in my own bed. It's been a rough week."

By Thursday morning, 14 of the city's 23 subway lines are expected to be operating, MTA Chairman Joseph Lhota said at a midday press briefing.

Of those, though, only one train, a shuttle between the Port Authority Bus Terminal and Grand Central, was running its full route. Officials said riders should expect delays and factor in up to an hour of extra travel time.

"Our overall goal is to get the system up and running," Lhota said. "Every day, more and more (service) is going to come back."

The MTA was still in the process Wednesday of trying to assess how badly its flooded tunnels and stations had been damaged.

The agency said it had deployed three special trains, each capable of pumping 4,500 gallons of water per minute, to drain the flooded tubes. By the afternoon, three of the seven tunnels that flooded had been pumped out.

That doesn't mean that the subways using those tunnels (the F, 2, 3, 4 and 5 trains) will be returning to service immediately. MTA spokesman Aaron Donovan said all the electrical equipment in the passages, including switches and the third rail, still need to be checked for damage potentially caused by the saltwater and possibly repaired.

But he estimated that restoration of service was probably days, rather than weeks, away.

Restoration of power to the southern part of Manhattan would pave the way for some train lines to extend farther south, and could possibly allow some river crossings. Some subway lines cross the East River on bridges rather than through the flooded tunnels.

Metro-North trains were to run on the Harlem line between Westchester County and Grand Central Terminal. The Long Island Rail Road planned to offer service to Brooklyn's Atlantic Terminal and said some trains would be able to operate into Manhattan.

Vehicle tunnels, including the Brooklyn Battery Tunnel, the Holland Tunnel and the Queens Midtown Tunnel, also took on huge amounts of water. The Brooklyn tunnel alone had an estimated 70 million gallons of water in it Wednesday morning, the MTA said.

That water was being carried out of the tunnel in tanker trucks, the agency said.

The Port Authority's PATH train system, which connects across the Hudson River to New Jersey, was also knocked out by flooding.

Port Authority said it was also still assessing damage and had no timetable for returning service.

Cuomo's announcement came as New York struggles to recover from Monday night's storm.

Bus service has resumed, but the system, which usually serves 2.3 million riders, was plagued Wednesday by overcrowding and traffic delays.

To ease the expected bottleneck, Mayor Michael Bloomberg announced Wednesday that the city's major East River and Harlem River bridges, as well as the Lincoln Tunnel across the Hudson River, would be restricted between 6 a.m. and midnight to vehicles with three or more people. Some traffic lanes would be for buses only. The mayor encouraged people to take a bus rather than drive.

"I know it is an inconvenience for a lot of people, but the bottom line is the streets can only handle so much," Bloomberg said.

Traffic on Interstate 95, crossing into Manhattan on the George Washington Bridge, would be exempt from the occupancy rules, the mayor said.

The Port Authority Bus Terminal, New York's biggest bus hub, also reopened Wednesday. But activity returned slowly, with no Greyhound service and no commuter buses to New Jersey.

Flights slowly got back in the air Wednesday at two major airports, and LaGuardia Airport was scheduled to reopen Thursday. The New York Stock Exchange rang back to life after two days without trading. But large swaths of the city and its northern suburbs -- about 1.6 million customers -- remain without power.

The subways carry 5.2 million riders daily. The LIRR and Metro-North each has 300,000 daily riders.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Scientists Skeptical of Dem Climate Change Claims

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Scientists Skeptical of Dem Climate Change Claims
Nov 1st 2012, 04:49

As the East Coast grapples with the fallout of Hurricane Sandy, Democrats are sounding the alarm over climate change, suggesting that carbon pollution played a role in bringing about the deadly storm.

"Hurricane Sandy is exactly the type of extreme weather event that climate scientists have said will become more frequent and more severe if we fail to reduce our carbon pollution," Democratic Reps. Henry Waxman of California and Bobby Rush of Illinois wrote in a letter Wednesday to Rep. Fred Upton, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

Waxman and Rush called on Upton to convene a lame-duck congressional hearing on the matter, accusing Republicans of ignoring the issue.

"For two years, the House of Representatives has pretended that climate change is not happening and that the consequences can be dismissed without concern," they wrote.

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo cited climate change in a press briefing earlier this week, arguing that, "Anyone who says there's not a dramatic change in weather patterns, I think, is denying reality."

But scientists say the evidence is far less concrete than the politicians appear to believe.

Martin Hoerling, a meteorologist with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, said Sandy wasn't boosted by global warming -- the storm merely revealed natural forces at work.

"Great events can have little causes," he told the New York Times. "In this case, the immediate cause is most likely little more that the coincidental alignment of a tropical storm with an extratropical storm."

The climate change debate has been absent from the campaign trail this year as economic recovery and foreign policy have dominated the headlines. But with Sandy's unprecedented devastation – leaving New York City subways flooded and ravaging coastal towns throughout New Jersey – activists are hoping to yet again spotlight the issue.

The office of Senate Energy Committee Chairman Jeff Bingaman sent a note to reporters reminding them of a previous hearing on the threat of rising sea levels to domestic infrastructure.

"When sea levels rise, the storm surge associated with extreme storms gets even worse," Bingaman, a New Mexico Democrat, said at the April hearing. "These impacts … are not theoretical and they are not disputed and they are not in the distant future."

As for Sandy, Andrew Weaver, a climate scientist with Canada's University of Victoria, said climate change didn't make an ordinary storm extraordinary.

"The ingredients of this storm seem a little bit cooked by climate change, but the overall storm is difficult to attribute to global warming," Weaver told the Associated Press.

But the science is anything but clear cut. Michael Mann, a Penn State University scientist who has been studying the climate for decades, said that ocean waters were about 1 degree warmer thanks to manmade climate change, one factor that clearly caused Sandy to swell.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Cable Warned Consulate Couldn't Withstand 'Coordinated Attack'

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Cable Warned Consulate Couldn't Withstand 'Coordinated Attack'
Nov 1st 2012, 02:41

The U.S. Mission in Benghazi convened an "emergency meeting" less than a month before the assault that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans, because Al Qaeda had training camps in Benghazi and the consulate could not defend against a "coordinated attack," according to a classified cable reviewed by Fox News.

Summarizing an Aug. 15 emergency meeting convened by the U.S. Mission in Benghazi, the Aug. 16 cable marked "SECRET" said that the State Department's senior security officer, also known as the RSO, did not believe the consulate could be protected.

"RSO (Regional Security Officer) expressed concerns with the ability to defend Post in the event of a coordinated attack due to limited manpower, security measures, weapons capabilities, host nation support, and the overall size of the compound," the cable said.

According to a review of the cable addressed to the Office of the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Emergency Action Committee was also briefed "on the location of approximately ten Islamist militias and AQ training camps within Benghazi … these groups ran the spectrum from Islamist militias, such as the QRF Brigade and Ansar al-Sharia, to 'Takfirist thugs.'" Each U.S. mission has a so-called Emergency Action Committee that is responsible for security measures and emergency planning.

The details in the cable seemed to foreshadow the deadly Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. compound, which was a coordinated, commando-style assault using direct and indirect fire. Al Qaeda in North Africa and Ansar al-Sharia, both mentioned in the cable, have since been implicated in the consulate attack.

In addition to describing the security situation in Benghazi as "trending negatively," the cable said explicitly that the mission would ask for more help. "In light of the uncertain security environment, US Mission Benghazi will submit specific requests to US Embassy Tripoli for additional physical security upgrades and staffing needs by separate cover."

As for specific threats against the U.S., the cable warned the intelligence was not clear on the issue, cautioning that the militias in Benghazi were not concerned with any significant retaliation from the Libyan government, which had apparently lost control in Benghazi. A briefer explained that they "did not have information suggesting that these entities were targeting Americans but did caveat that (there was not) a complete picture of their intentions yet. RSO (Regional Security Officer) noted that the Benghazi militias have become more brazen in their actions and have little fear of reprisal from the (government of Libya.)"

While the administration's public statements have suggested that the attack came without warning, the Aug. 16 cable seems to undercut those claims. It was a direct warning to the State Department that the Benghazi consulate was vulnerable to attack, that it could not be defended and that the presence of anti-U.S. militias and Al Qaeda was well-known to the U.S. intelligence community.

In a three-page cable on Sept 11, the day Stevens and the three other Americans were killed, Stevens wrote about "growing problems with security" in Benghazi and "growing frustration" with the security forces and Libyan police. The ambassador saw both as "too weak to keep the country secure."

Fox News asked the State Department to respond to a series of questions about the Aug. 16 cable, including who was specifically charged with reviewing it and whether action was taken by Washington or Tripoli. Fox News also asked, given the specific warnings and the detailed intelligence laid out in the cable, whether the State Department considered extra measures for the consulate in light of the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks – and if no action was taken, who made that call.

The State Department press office declined to answer specific questions, citing the classified nature of the cable.

"An independent board is conducting a thorough review of the assault on our post in Benghazi," Deputy Spokesman Mark Toner said in written statement. "Once we have the board's comprehensive account of what happened, findings and recommendations, we can fully address these matters."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Auto industry touted by Obama still rubs some industry retirees the wrong way

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Auto industry touted by Obama still rubs some industry retirees the wrong way
Nov 1st 2012, 02:52

President Obama never fails to mention the billions in federal dollars pumped into the U.S. auto industry when campaigning in Ohio.

At a recent campaign stop in Dayton, the president describes the bailout this way: "I bet on American workers. I bet on American manufacturing. I would do it again because that bet has paid off for Ohio and for America in a big way."

Former Delphi plant manager Tom Rose has a different opinion about the bailout: "It's good press. It's good politics, but it's only one side of the story."

Rose and tens of thousands of other Delphi retirees were nervous in 2009 when the company was trudging its way through bankruptcy. So a lot of questions were asked, like how's our pension looking?

The answer, says Rose, was a thumbs-up from management, which said the pension was well funded.

And then, it wasn't.

Delphi abruptly cancelled its employee pensions and turned over what remained in them to the federal government to administer.

It was the nightmare scenario for Delphi retirees. The monthly payments that were to be their financial bedrock through retirement years were slashed. The cuts were staggering, ranged from 30 to 70 percent.

After 39 years on the job, Rose's pension was clipped 40 percent.

"You spend years and years making your financial plan for your retirement ... and going through all the numbers," Rose said, "and it gets taken away from you in a heartbeat. ... and I feel absolutely betrayed."

But it was at this time that a floundering General Motors was seeking emergency help from the federal government. The company was in needs of billions. Chrysler was also at the White House door looking for assistance.

The Obama administration was willing but demanded a rapid restructuring of the companies. Typically, in these kinds of bankruptcies or bankruptcy-like circumstances, concessions are made or financial commitments are broken. But what GM needed besides the infusion of cash from the federal government was labor peace.

Any deal between the U.S. government and GM was not binding on the United Auto Workers. That gave the union leverage. What it wanted was its retired Delphi members taken care of.

GM already had an agreement with the UAW to "top-off" its union pensions at Delphi, if that company went into bankruptcy.

Steven Rattner, point-man for the White House on the bailout, notes that these types of side agreements typically get tossed out in bankruptcies. To Rattner, it was important for
GM to honor the side-deal about Delphi members.

"It was not easy to decide where to draw the line," says Rattner, "but ultimately we decided that GM should honor its prior agreement (with the UAW)."

But that was it. Salaried Delphi retiree pensions were not made whole. The 20,000 who had banked their future on their pensions were left to figure it out on their own.

Tom Rose thinks he knows why. "The union had political connections and we did not," he said.

In Rose's opinion, and that of many more salaried Delphi retirees, the pension decision was a political payoff. It was nothing more than a Democratic president and his administration taking care of an ally, organized labor.

Rattner insists that not the case.

"We had lots of discussions about whether to top off all of the pensions," Rattner said.

It came down to necessity. Rattner says GM could not survive without people on the floors of the factories working. That and the side agreement with the UAW cinched it.

To Rose, it all comes down to fairness.

"You've got two groups of employees working for the same company that are in the identical situation and yet they are treated distinctly different by our own federal government," he said.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: BIAS ALERT: Bush Bad for Economy, but Not Obama?

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
BIAS ALERT: Bush Bad for Economy, but Not Obama?
Nov 1st 2012, 00:51

Twenty-three million people unemployed or underemployed, a $16-trillion debt and repeated trillion-dollar deficits.

Boo.

The scariest thing this Halloween has nothing to do with witches and goblins or even the Munsters remake (ugh). The scariest thing in America right now is the continued awful economy.

An incumbent president running for re-election in a down economy – we've heard that story before. Only when we heard it last time, George W. Bush was running for re-election in 2004 and the economy was in remarkably fine shape.

That horror story hasn't been told by the major media according to a soon-to-be-released report from the Media Research Center titled "Upside Down Economics." The report shows the reality of two different elections and how ABC, CBS and NBC chose to depict the Bush economy as doing badly and ignored or downplay the many faults of the Obama economic record.

Think back to September, 2004. Broadcast coverage criticized Bush on the economy despite economic growth of 3.3 percent, an unemployment rate of just 5.4 percent and gas prices a low $1.82. Even the $7.4 trillion federal debt is but a fond memory now.

To say Bush was depicted in scary terms is an understatement. His jobs record was actually compared to Herbert Hoover (never a good thing). ABC's Betsy Stark even warned of a recession in her "World News Tonight" report on soaring oil. She was a bit premature since it took more than three years for that recession to arrive.

NBC's "Today" highlighted a voter who condemned the President Bush in the harshest terms. "I really think Bush has ruined the economy. We've lost so many jobs, and I haven't seen him do anything to really fix it," the voter said, even though unemployment sat at a robust 5.4 percent.

The story eight years later has gone from trick to treat. In September (as this research was done) US unemployment stood at 8.1 percent, close to 3 percent higher than it had been under Bush at the exact same point in his term. Economic growth was downgraded to 1.3 percent, part of a continued decline. The tandem of unemployment and underemployment meant 23 million Americans were out looking for work.

But network journalists didn't dare depict that nightmare. ABC's professional Democrat George Stephanopoulos interviewed White House adviser David Plouffe on "Good Morning America," asking about the budget. He let Plouffe claim the administration had "cut over $3 trillion in spending, more than what was called for in the Bowles-Simpson plan," yet forgot to mention that the federal debt had ballooned to $16 trillion under Obama.

Also left out of that discussion was the fact that Obama's proposed budget didn't have a ghost of a chance. It didn't get any Republican votes in the Senate or any Democratic votes either.

Even gas prices, near and dear to American wallets, were downplayed. Gas was nearly 100 percent higher than it had been under Bush. Rather than media screams, journalists put on a positive spin on things. ABC's Diane Sawyer reflected that trend when she called for "relief is in sight and soon" on Sept. 4 as gas hit $3.84 a gallon – almost $2 a gallon higher than it had been on Bush.

Less than a week till the election and media honesty about the economy is as elusive as the Great Pumpkin.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Maryland man, 24, wins World Series of Poker, $8.53M

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Maryland man, 24, wins World Series of Poker, $8.53M
Oct 31st 2012, 23:49

LAS VEGAS –  A 24-year-old Maryland poker professional has won the World Series of Poker main event, lasting nearly 12 hours in a marathon card session to push past his last opponents for the $8.53 million title early Wednesday.

Greg Merson emerged with the title before dawn in Las Vegas after a session that proved a showcase for his skills amid the unpredictability of tournament no-limit Texas Hold 'me.

On the last hand, Merson put Las Vegas card pro Jesse Sylvia, all-in with a king high. Sylvia thought hard, then called with a suited queen-jack.

"This whole stage is nothing you could ever prepare for," Merson said.

Merson's hand held through the community cards -- two sixes, a three a nine and a seven -- to give him the title and put his names alongside former champions including Doyle Brunson, Phil Hellmuth and Johnny Chan.

After an exhausting session, he's ready to join them.

"I feel pretty good -- got all the tears out so now I feel relaxed," Merson said.

Merson also pushed past Hellmuth for the series' Player of the Year honors, proving himself the top performer throughout this year's series of card tournaments in Las Vegas and Europe. Merson also won a tournament bracelet this summer in Las Vegas, for a no-limit Texas Hold 'em 6-handed tournament.

Sylvia won $5.3 million for second place.

"That was nuts, man," Sylvia said. "I thought whoever was going to heads-up was going to be much deeper than we were."

Merson's victory over Sylvia, 26, came after the pair outlasted the last amateur at the table, 21-year-old Jake Balsiger. The Arizona State senior hoping to become the youngest World Series of Poker champion was eliminated in third place, more than 11 hours into the marathon.

Balsiger gambled his last chips with a queen-10 and was dominated by Merson's king-queen.

Merson's hand held through five community cards, forcing Balsiger to exit the tournament no richer than he was starting Tuesday's finale.

The political science major who has vowed to graduate won $3.8 million for third place.

"I have some homework due tomorrow, my Supreme Court class," Balsiger said. "I didn't do it last week because I was in a final table simulation, so my professor's probably not the happiest with me."

His ouster set up Merson against Sylvia for the title, with $8.53 million at stake.

Even before Balsiger was eliminated, the players set a series record by pushing beyond 364 hands at the final table. Balsiger lost on hand 382, while Sylvia lost on hand 399.

All three players traded chips, big bluffs and shocking hands during their marathon run.

They started play Tuesday night having already outlasted six others at a final table that began on Monday. But they refused to give in to one another, with roughly $4.8 million on the line -- the difference between first and third place.

"This is exciting," Balsiger told his tablemates just before midnight Wednesday in a game playing out as part mental sparring, part plain luck.

Merson took a commanding chip lead early with perhaps his gutsiest play of the tournament -- sensing weakness in Balsiger and re-raising a 10 million chip bet all-in with just queen high. Balsiger couldn't call, and Merson moved up to more than 100 million in chips.

He didn't have that chip lead for long.

Several hands later, Balsiger wagered the last of his chips with an ace-10 and was well behind Sylvia's ace-queen with his tournament at risk. But a 10 came on the turn, allowing Balsiger to double up.

Then, Sylvia went all-in against Merson, his ace-king against Merson's pocket kings. A four on the river made a wheel straight -- ace through five -- and vaulted Sylvia to the chip lead, sending his supporters at the Rio All-Suite Hotel & Casino into a frenzy.

Later in the session, Balsiger doubled his chips to a lead through Sylvia with pocket kings. Soon after, Sylvia took the chip lead back.

And so it went -- par for the course in poker, a game where skill is significant, but luck is certainly a factor.

Balsiger eliminated Russell Thomas in fourth place just after midnight early Tuesday to set up the trio's final showdown.

Merson went into play Tuesday night with 88.4 million in chips, compared with 62.8 million for Sylvia and 46.9 million for Balsiger.

Merson picked up hands and took control of the three-handed table at the start, picking up strong hands and building his stack to more than half the chips in the tournament.

But Sylvia's fold of a strong hand -- a nine high flush -- likely kept him in the tournament after he finished contemplating a Merson bet of nearly 3 million in chips. Merson held a queen high flush in a cooler-type hand -- one that gamblers in Sylvia's spot routinely lose on.

Sylvia went into the nine-handed final table with a chip lead but lost it to Merson after Merson benefited from an opponent's unforced error.

Merson eliminated Hungarian poker professional Andras Koroknai in sixth place, calling Koroknai's all-in bet with an ace-king and finding Koroknai with king-queen -- a marginal hand for the situation.

Chips have no real monetary value in tournament poker. Each player at the final table must lose all his chips to lose the tournament, and win all the chips at the table to be crowned champion.

The tournament began in July with 6,598 players and was chopped down to nine through seven sessions spread over 11 days. Play stopped after nearly 67 hours logged at the tables for each player, with minimum bets going up every two hours.

The finalists played Monday night until only three players remained, leaving the top three to settle the title.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: Final Brown-Warren debate canceled, as poll shows close race for Massachusetts Senate seat

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Final Brown-Warren debate canceled, as poll shows close race for Massachusetts Senate seat
Oct 31st 2012, 23:49

The final debate between Massachusetts Republican Sen. Scott Brown and Democratic challenger Elizabeth Warren has been canceled, as superstorm Sandy slammed the East Coast and a new poll shows the race deadlocked with seven days remaining.

Colin Reed, Brown's communications director, released the following statement:

"It is unfortunate that nature intervened in a way we all agreed made it inappropriate to carry on with the scheduled debate. With only days remaining in the campaign, and with a long-planned bus tour kicking off Thursday through Election Day that will take Scott Brown to every corner of the Commonwealth, our calendar simply cannot accommodate a rescheduling of this fourth debate and the planning and preparation that would go into it. Senator Brown is pleased to have participated in three major televised debates, and regrets that Professor Warren refused two additional earlier debate opportunities that he accepted."

"It is unfortunate voters will not have the chance to hear from both candidates on the important issues facing Massachusetts," Mindy Myers, campaign manager for Elizabeth Warren, said in a statement. "Elizabeth was working with the debate organizers to move forward on Thursday.  Unfortunately but not surprisingly, Scott Brown is again ducking questions about his record voting on the side of big oil and billionaires and against equal pay for equal work, against a pro-choice Supreme Court Justice and against  insurance coverage for birth control.  Elizabeth agreed to additional debates that Brown refused in Worcester and the South Coast as well as a forum hosted by the NAACP.  Scott Brown doesn't want to have to talk about his record - plain and simple."

The final debate, scheduled for Tuesday, was canceled because of superstorm Sandy, leaving the candidates without a final opportunity for a face-to-face discussion about campaign issues amid undecided voters.

A Boston Globe poll released Monday shows the candidates tied at 47 percent, following the paper's September poll in which Brown trailed by 5 percentage points.

The race has been one of most expensive and compelling of the 2012 election cycle, with Republicans trying to gain four Senate seats to take control of the chamber.

Brown is seeking re-election after his surprising victory in 2010 in the special election for the open seat of Democratic Sen. Ted Kennedy.

Warren has faced accusations of trying to use her American Indian heritage to get a teaching job at Harvard Law School, while Brown tries to win a second term in a strongly Democratic state.

Warren said that her parents told her growing up that her mother was part Cherokee and part Delaware Indian and that as a child she never questioned that story.

Both candidates postponed campaigning Monday. Brown said he was working to make sure the state received any federal help needed while Warren closed all her field offices and asked her staff and volunteers to be ready to assist if needed.

Late Monday, Brown announced he wouldn't be attending Tuesday's fourth and final debate, sponsored by a consortium of Boston media outlets.

A Brown spokesman said the senator decided against the debate "out of concern for the hardship faced by people in the path of Hurricane Sandy."

"It is simply not appropriate to go forward with a political debate when a disaster strikes. The focus for all of us before, during and after the storm needs to be on emergency response and disaster relief, not campaigns and politics," spokesman Colin Reed said in a statement.

 Brown said he would "certainly" participate in another debate before voters go to the polls next week.

 "If it's appropriate, we will have it," he said. "Certainly we're going to do it. I think the people will want to hear where we stand on all the final issues ... before the election."

Brown last week even offered Warren a lift to the debate should Sandy have created tough driving conditions.

"That's why I have a truck," he said.

Myers said Warren also agreed the debate should not have been held Tuesday.

The full force of the storm largely spared Massachusetts.

An averaging of polls by the website RealClearPolitics has Warren leading by 3.7 percentage points.

The Boston Globe poll included voters who are undecided, but said which candidate they are leaning toward supporting.

Among the poll's likely voters, Brown received 45 percent, compared with 43 percent for Warren, well within the poll's margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.

The poll of 583 likely voters was conducted from Wednesday through Sunday by the University of New Hampshire Survey Center.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: DEAD HEAT: Just 6 Days Before America Votes, Poll Shows It's Tied

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
DEAD HEAT: Just 6 Days Before America Votes, Poll Shows It's Tied
Oct 31st 2012, 23:50

With less than a week before the election, the race for the White House is dead even: Barack Obama and Mitt Romney receive 46 percent each, according to a Fox News poll of likely voters.

Romney had a razor-thin 46-45 percent edge earlier this month, after the first presidential debate (October 7-9).  

Interviews in areas affected by Hurricane Sandy were completed before Monday evening, when the hurricane made landfall.

Independents give the edge to Romney by seven percentage points (46-39 percent).  That's down from a 12-point advantage in early October.  

There's a gender gap in vote preference, as men back Romney by 51-42 percent, while women side with Obama by 50-42 percent.  

The new Fox poll finds Obama under-performing compared to his 2008 exit poll numbers by 13 percentage points among independents, 9 points among white men, 6 points among women and 4 points among voters under age 30.  

Among the subgroup of most interested voters, those who are "extremely" interested in the election, Romney leads Obama by 53-42 percent.

The poll, released Wednesday, shows almost all Obama (92 percent) and Romney (91 percent) supporters say they will "definitely" vote for their candidate.  Seven percent of Obama voters and eight percent of Romney voters say they will "probably" support or "lean" toward supporting their candidate.  

Still, Romney's supporters continue to be more enthusiastic: 69 percent say it's extremely important he win, while 59 percent of those backing Obama feel that way.  

And consider this: Fully 82 percent of Romney supporters say this year's election is more important than the 2008 election.  That's 16 points higher than the 66 percent of Obama supporters who say the same.  

Overall, 73 percent of voters feel this year's election is more important than 2008.  

Some good news in the poll for Obama is that nearly half of voters -- 46 percent -- are satisfied with the way things are going in the country today.  That's up from 31 percent two years ago, right before Republicans swept the midterm elections (October 2010).

In addition, by a slim two percentage-point margin, more voters think the economy is getting better than getting worse (45-43 percent).  

The Romney campaign is focused on the 53 percent of voters who are unhappy with the way things are going in the country today, and the 50 percent who agree with him that government is too big.

Meanwhile, over half of voters -- 55 percent -- would like to see all or part of Obama's health care law repealed -- something Romney's said he would do on "Day 1."

Nearly equal numbers of voters would be comfortable with each of the candidates as president:  44 percent would be comfortable with Obama for another four years, and 40 percent would be comfortable with Romney as president.  Majorities would be uncomfortable with each (55 percent Obama, 58 percent Romney).

Forty-four percent of voters say economic issues such as jobs and growth will be most important in deciding their vote for president.  That's more than twice as many as any other issues.  Sixteen percent say fiscal issues such as taxes, the deficit and government spending, 13 percent say social issues and seven percent national security issues.

Voters who say the economy will be most important in their decision back Romney by 50-43 percent, and fiscal-issue voters back him by a similar 50-41 percent.

In addition, more voters trust Romney on the top issues.  More trust him to improve the economy (+9 points), reduce the deficit (+5 points) and manage their taxes (+5 points).  By 54-41 percent, voters also think Romney has the right experience to create more jobs.

Obama comes out on top on handling foreign policy (+8 points), helping people achieve the American dream (+8 points), handling education (+7 points) and terrorism (+6 points).

The candidates are tied on taking the country in the right direction, encouraging the right values, handling health care and national security.  

In addition, the two are about equally liked by voters.  Fifty-two percent have a favorable opinion of Obama, while 51 percent have a positive view of Romney.

When voters are given more options to describe their views, the poll shows most like Obama as a person (69 percent).  On his policies, some 48 percent like them, while 51 dislike them.

A 56-percent majority of voters likes Romney as a person.  On his policies, voters divide almost evenly:  48 percent like his policies and 49 percent dislike them.

Forty-seven percent of voters like both Obama and his policies, while 42 percent like both Romney and his policies.  

Some 29 percent dislike both Obama and his policies.  For Romney, that's 35 percent.

The Fox News poll is based on live telephone interviews on landlines and cell phones from October 28 to October 30 among 1,128 randomly-chosen likely voters nationwide.  Likely voters are registered voters who are considered most likely to vote in the November presidential election.  The poll is conducted under the joint direction of Anderson Robbins Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R).  For the total sample, it has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points.  

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: States Scramble as Sandy Could Disrupt Election Day

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
States Scramble as Sandy Could Disrupt Election Day
Oct 31st 2012, 21:49

Widespread power outages along the East Coast had officials in at least four states scrambling Wednesday to devise contingency plans for Election Day voting.

In New York, where at least 26 people statewide died and nearly 2 million remain without power as of Wednesday, Board of Elections officials continue to work with county authorities and Gov. Andrew Cuomo regarding contingency plans. No additional information was available, a spokeswoman told FoxNews.com.

"Due to hurricane Sandy, poll site information for the November 6, 2012 election may change," a state Board of Elections website reads.

Federal law sets the election for the day after the first Monday in November, under authority granted to Congress by the U.S. Constitution. Only Congress can change Election Day, according to an 1845 law. Although it has never happened, some experts said every state would have to be included if the calendar were changed.

More likely is the prospect that hard-hit states will manage with a hodge-podge of contingencies. Some states, including Connecticut and Massachusetts, use paper ballots that are then counted by electronic scanning equipment, so counting the ballots could be done where the power is on. Experts also said voting equipment could be operate on battery power or, under the worst case scenario, all voting could be done on paper ballots which could then be counted by hand.

Roughly 100 of Connecticut's 770 voting locations are without power, according to Secretary of State Denise Merrill, but she said Tuesday's election would go on as planned.

"It will go forward no matter what," Merrill said by phone. "I think we're in pretty good shape."

"It will go forward no matter what."

- Denise Merrill, Connecticut secretary of state

As a result of Sandy's destruction, voting registration has been extended to 8 p.m. Thursday, she said.

Restoring power to affected polling sites in the states is a top priority, added Merrill's spokesman Av Harris.

"We should be reluctant to move polling places because those are usually neighborhood fixtures. You don't want to confuse voters. It's sort of a last resort," Harris told FoxNews.com.

In New Jersey, which suffered some of the worst storm devastation, officials were still working out an alternative plan as of Wednesday afternoon.

"It's too early for me to say anything," a representative from the state board of elections told FoxNews.com, adding that a plan should be in place by Thursday morning.

The plan could include the use of paper ballots instead of electronic voting machines and a change in polling sites for communities that typically rely on area schools. A postponement appears highly unlikely, though voting hours could be extended at various polling locations.

Federal Emergency Management Agency's administrator, Craig Fugate, told the Associated Press on Monday he anticipated the storm's impact could linger into next week and affect the election.  FEMA would look at what assistance it could provide to states prior to next Tuesday, he said.

"This will be led by the states," Fugate said.

Hours after the powerful storm pummeled New Jersey's shore towns — causing billions in damage — Gov. Chris Christie told reporters Tuesday that Election Day logistics were not among his concerns.

"I don't give a damn about Election Day," he said. "It doesn't matter a lick to me. I've got much bigger fish to fry."

"Right now I'm much more concerned about preventing any other loss of life, getting people to safe places," Christie said.

President Obama earlier this week scrapped two days of campaigning and hunkered down at the White House to oversee the government's response to a storm that has affected voters in at least 13 states.

"The election will take care of itself next week," Obama told reporters on Monday.

FoxNews.com's Cristina Corbin and Joshua Rhett Miller contributed to this report. 

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: SANDY'S DEATH TOLL HITS 48; DAMAGE COULD TOP $20 BILLION

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
SANDY'S DEATH TOLL HITS 48; DAMAGE COULD TOP $20 BILLION
Oct 31st 2012, 20:52

The death toll from superstorm Sandy is up to 62 and expected to keep climbing as workers comb through floodwaters, rubble and fallen trees in the more than a dozen states affected by the 900-mile-wide weather system.

As the cleanup began, stories of tragedy and heroism emerged. An 8-year-old Pennsylvania boy was crushed by a falling tree when he went out to check on the family's newborn calves. A New York police officer saved seven members of his family before drowning in raging floodwaters invading the family's basement. A Brooklyn couple died together when a tree fell on them as they walked their dog - which survived.

"We will get through the days ahead by doing what we always do in tough times — by standing together, shoulder to shoulder, ready to help a neighbor, comfort a stranger and get the city we love back on its feet."

- New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg

"We will get through the days ahead by doing what we always do in tough times — by standing together, shoulder to shoulder, ready to help a neighbor, comfort a stranger and get the city we love back on its feet," New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg said.

Perhaps no story captured the drama and tragedy of Sandy better than that of NYPD police officer Artur Kasprzak. The 28-year-old drowned Monday night after rescuing seven members of his family, including his 15-month-old son, from the flood waters filling the basement of his Staten Island home. After getting them to safety by ushering them into the attic, Kasprzak went to the basement one more time but never returned, according to an NYPD news release.

Police responded to his family's desperate 911 call, but scuba divers who arrived in inflatable Zodiac boats and jet skis couldn't reach the home because of downed power lines snaking through the water.

"He was really a great guy, well-liked, very professional and hard working," Kasprzak's commanding officer, Deputy Inspector Edward Winski, told the Daily News. "It was very difficult this morning when I had to tell everyone. It's heart-breaking, to be honest with you."

A majority of deaths were caused by falling trees, surging floodwaters and downed electrical wires, especially in New York City, where at least 24 people have been found dead since Monday.

- Couple Jacob Vogelman, and Jessie Streich-Kest were walking their dog in the Ditmas Park section of Brooklyn on Monday evening when a tree fell on them.

- In Queens, a 70-year-old woman was found floating inside her home early Tuesday morning by police after relatives were unable to reach her. Also in Queens, Lauren Abraham, a 23-year-old makeup artist went to the end of her driveway to take pictures during the height of the storm on Monday and stepped into a puddle electrified by a downed wire.

- On Staten Island, officials were checking homes Tuesday afternoon when they found the bodies of John Filipowicz Sr., 50, and his 20-year-old son, John Filipowicz Jr. Both men were crushed by debris in their basement.

- Thirteen-year-old Angela Dresch was found dead after a massive wave slammed into her family's home on the south shore of Staten Island. her father, George is still missing, and her mother Patricia is clinging to life at Staten Island University Hospital.

- A 54-year-old man from Yonkers, N.Y., was killed instantly when his car struck a tree that had fallen on the Sprain Brook Highway in Westchester County. The impact caused his car to careen into the center embankment, knocking down several other trees.

Sandy took the lives of many in other states as well.

In the town of Pasadena, Md., near Annapolis, a man was killed after a tree fell on his house late Monday evening, just as the monster storm was making landfall.

Near Boston, in Peabody, Mass., a passenger in an SUV was killed after he was thrown from the vehicle as it rolled over and slammed into a guardrail. Two other passengers were ejected, but they and the driver survived.

In Franklin Township, Pa., 8-year-old Matthew Stahl went outside onto his family's farm to check on the calves. His father told him to run inside, but a falling tree killed the boy before he could reach safety.

In Hawthorne, N.J., a 77-year-old man was killed instantly when a tree crashed into his house.

Sandy's lethal reach even extended to Canada, where a woman was struck and killed by a sign that fell from a Staples store amid 40 mph winds.

The earliest casualties of superstorm Sandy were crew members of the "HMS Bounty" tall ship off the coast of North Carolina. Claudine Christian, 42, was knocked off the replica ship, which had been featured in several movies, and was found in the turbulent waters of the Atlantic four hours later. Search crews are still hunting for the ship's captain, Robin Walbridge, who is believed to be wearing a survival suit that can keep him afloat.

The 14 other members of the crew were safely rescued as the ship sank.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: BIAS ALERT: MSNBC's Mitchell Slams Romney

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
BIAS ALERT: MSNBC's Mitchell Slams Romney
Oct 31st 2012, 18:50

Even when Mitt Romney cancels campaigning and works to provide Hurricane Sandy relief, the media elites are still dropping bombs on him. The hurricane has given Obama "invaluable imagery and opportunity to be seen in command," said CNN's Dana Bash. Meanwhile, Washington Post columnist Al Kamen cracked that Romney is "finding that, unlike franks and beans, charity and politics can be a tricky mix."

The "tricky" part of the mix is the media. Their opportunistic bashing of Romney's food drive shows it doesn't matter what the Republicans will do, the media will stick to anti-Romney talking points.

In Tuesday afternoon's broadcast of "Andrea Mitchell Reports" on MSNBC, Mitchell accused Romney of surreptitious campaigning, and asked what are the true intentions of Governor Romney collecting storm supplies after a hurricane. Mitchell reported, "We checked with the Red Cross.  The Red Cross said while they're always grateful for donations – that this is not what they need or want," she insisted. "And to now get these canned good from the Romney event in Ohio – and have to first package it – used clothes they have to clean."

She turned to Washington Post political analyst Chris Cillizza and sneered,  "It does seem like a thinly veiled [campaign event] – why Ohio?" 

If there's something Andrea Mitchell is not is "thinly veiled" when it comes to sending a political message.

Mitchell revealed herself, yet again, as a liberal partisan, and someone who borders on absent minded when it comes to common sense.  There are 7.5 million people without power, and how dare Mitt Romney try to help those in need?

Mitchell's MSNBC colleague Martin Bashir added to this anti-charity narrative, going so far as to imply Romney was disobeying the Red Cross. After a clip of Obama speaking at the Red Cross, Bashir asked his guests: "Did you detect perhaps a subtle dig there on Mr. Romney who spent today going against the guidelines established by the Red Cross and holding a campaign rally in Ohio that was dressed up like a charity drive collecting food and other supplies when the Red Cross expressly asked people not to do that?"

As Noel Sheppard of NewsBusters aptly said, "Imagine that. A presidential candidate, who gives millions of dollars a year to charity, does a storm relief event in Ohio, and an MSNBC anchor is disgusted by it because the Red Cross would prefer people donating cash."

Then on MSNBC's "The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell," there was another less-than-charming episode of Romney Can't Win.

Joy-Ann Reid, the former Obama campaign staffer who now runs the NBC-owned site TheGrio.com, insisted "anything he [Romney] does looks almost by nature too political. And he can't actually do anything. He can't do anything certainly for Chris Christie. Going around with Mitt Romney and his Secret Service detail through the affected areas of New Jersey would actually cause more problems and wouldn't help at all."

But doesn't Obama have a Secret Service detail, too? 

That doesn't matter to Reid. Obama has power: "whereas going around with the president helps him look at the damage, really view it for himself. He can get something out of doing that with the president. So, I think Romney unfortunately is the odd man out."

Liberals never really mean it's "unfortunate" when they argue Republicans just can't possibly be portrayed as compassionate conservatives.

Matt Vespa is an intern for the Media Research Center.

Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and senior editor of MRC's blog NewsBusters.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: GOP Accuses Obama of Hiding Info on Libya Attack

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
GOP Accuses Obama of Hiding Info on Libya Attack
Oct 31st 2012, 17:49

Four Republican senators accused President Obama on Wednesday of ignoring their repeated requests for information about the Libya terror attack, raising the question of whether the administration is "deliberately stonewalling" Congress.

The senators, who have blasted out a series of inquiries to various agencies since the deadly Sept. 11 strike, said Wednesday that "we have failed to receive a single letter in response."

"The American people and their representatives in Congress need to understand what you knew about the Benghazi terrorist attack and when you knew it," wrote Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.; John McCain, R-Ariz.; Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H.; and Ron Johnson, R-Wis. "We also have a right to know what steps you and your administration took — or failed to take — before, during and after the terrorist attack to protect American lives."

The senators, in their lengthy letter, recapped all their concerns and questions – ranging from when officials first determined the attack was terrorism to whether Obama knew about two prior attacks this year on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi to why requests for earlier security were denied.

"Your failure to answer these important questions will only add to the growing perception among many of our constituents that your administration has undertaken a concerted effort to misrepresent the facts and stonewall Congress and the American people," the senators wrote.

Ayotte on Wednesday told Fox News, "We've written already half a dozen letters. ... They've not answered us. They're stonewalling us and I think they're trying to run out the clock until this election."

Scrutiny of the administration's response to and handling of the Libya attack had been mounting in recent days, before superstorm Sandy practically suspended the presidential campaign for two days and drew Obama back to the White House. Lawmakers, though, are keeping up the pressure on the administration – as the father of Tyrone Woods, a former Navy SEAL killed in the attack, starts to speak out about his frustration with the administration's handling of the entire tragedy.

The questions at this point have spread far beyond concerns about why officials initially described the strike as a "spontaneous" act in response to demonstrations over an anti-Islam film.

The latest letter renews the senators' call to declassify surveillance footage in and around the consulate on Sept. 11 and Sept. 12.

The renewed request came after senior intelligence officials told Fox News that a Tunisian man arrested in connection with the attack was identified by the internal surveillance video.

The senators also reiterated questions about what military forces were available to help during the attack, and what forces were requested.

Fox News reported last week that sources claim officers at the nearby CIA annex in Benghazi were twice told to stand down when they requested to help those at the consulate. They later ignored those orders.

Fox News was also told that a subsequent request for back-up when the annex came under attack was denied as well.

The CIA and Defense Department have denied claims about requests for support being rejected.

"The agency reacted quickly to aid our colleagues during that terrible evening in Benghazi," said CIA spokeswoman Jennifer Youngblood last week. "Moreover, no one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need. Claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate."  

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said there was not a clear enough picture of what was occurring on the ground in Benghazi to send help. 

"There's a lot of Monday morning quarterbacking going on here," he said Thursday. "But the basic principle here ... is that you don't deploy forces into harm's way without knowing what's going on." 

Obama, meanwhile, declined to answer directly during a TV interview last week on whether a request for military assistance was denied.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

FOXNews.com: BIAS ALERT: Expect MM to Resume Obama Boosting

FOXNews.com
FOX News Channel - We Report. You Decide. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
BIAS ALERT: Expect MM to Resume Obama Boosting
Oct 31st 2012, 17:49

This transcript is automatically generated

Thanks -- and Bill O'Reilly in the week -- Bernie segment tonight after the storm chaos of size most likely on Thursday it'll be back to presidential campaigning.

With US media heavily invested in president Obama's reelection how will that -- what ties play out.

Joining us -- North Carolina -- some thoughts Bernard Goldberg -- what do you expect to see on Thursday through Monday night.

I don't think we're going to see anything different bill.

In the final days of the campaign then we've seen throughout the campaign and what we've seen throughout the campaign is the media pretty much.

Covering.

Up for President Obama.

So let let's take one example I think that the media will continue.

To show the same astonishingly.

Lack of curiosity over how the president handled Ben -- They've shown very little interest before they'll show very little interest -- How they will portray the president as a strong leader and presidential.

Because of how we covered.

How we handled -- the hurricane and he -- talk about that even after Thursday so they'll continue to portray him as a strong leader.

Which is perfectly fine but I'm wondering if at some point we start to see comparisons.

Between -- Obama.

And hurricane sandy and President Bush and Hurricane Katrina.

Yeah but I don't think that's gonna have now look it's retail politics now the factor has I've spoken at the highest levels.

With the Romney campaign.

And the Obama campaign and I said -- You know you gotta do an interview with me it'll be a worldwide event everybody to be watching it -- be on the Internet.

Yeah this on the idea.

He basically said well that's is a word they use that's intriguing.

That means you know have a chance in hell tries to get -- India -- intriguing means it is an ain't gonna happen.

At at -- look I understand President Obama because he would have to answer questions about Libby.

Not heavy Brian Williams here the -- micro questions about -- is not going to be we're investigating -- cut so here are gonna do it because of that.

But I cannot stay alive Mitt Romney is not doing it because Mitt Romney has -- story to tell in my opinion.

He has -- story to tell.

But I think what the strategy is on -- campaign is to -- in Ohio Virginia Florida Colorado and Nevada.

Real strong.

And then we have the Electoral College if we can take all of those states we -- went back and -- do this O'Reilly punk when I'm gonna bother with you have not.

I don't think I don't think they see you in a negative light I think they make it they made a calculation.

And the calculation is.

That there's not enough upside to take a chance doing an interview with you but -- nothing wrong calculation.

Well maybe it is maybe it isn't but that's the one that I think we both agree that they've made yet although I would say otherwise they'd be here instead -- right now.

Well nobody ever bump you but we certainly are I I -- I offered both of the candidates.

I happen -- On a fact -- back to back.

But the upside to both of -- is that they get to show the American people.

In a very challenging forum with a beta because there is.

I -- submit -- and everybody else says -- it could go either way still burning.

That could clear the way you know totally new look at for a tipping point I hate to steal Malcolm Gladwell is book title what you're looking -- that.

Did the tipping point this is what you.

Maybe who knows we disagreed the tipping point may goal in the wrong direction.

If Mitt Romney sits down with.

but what -- let me would you rather go out guns blazing.

-- and everything that you can to win the game in the fourth quarter right or you want to run out the clock.

Now the answer -- I'd rather go out guns blasier and -- but we'll wait a second but I might define.

Guns blazing -- spending more time in Ohio and Iowa and Wisconsin.

And not not sitting down with you with -- same -- off it's the same stuff.

Well yeah -- and -- and I don't know hold hold on and you may ask things that that that bring out answers that aren't the same stuff.

And that's where the problem lies you know.

I saw as an upside I mean I think you wanna win.

And I -- told governor Romney's people with all due respect called John McCain.

And call.

Senator.

My guide them sold.

Kerry.

In in Massachusetts because both what it said to me.

We shouldn't -- last week both of them.

You you're crazy not to take that that opportunity.

Well they they they made a decision and it's -- yes it's still in play.

If you wanted you wanted to put any.

Just between us I don't want the folks at homeless and it's good if -- put any money on this.

I think -- might do it.

I can't penalize them and President Obama when I -- zeroes that's so I don't say I don't know I mean it would have to be his call he'd have to make it.

The president -- to make it himself.

Can I -- quick question yeah.

Do you think that more than a few reporters.

Are sort of wishing -- some level.

That the hurricane.

Had not hit two Blue States like new York -- New Jersey.

But it hit Iowa.

And Ohio they did -- stops and and I -- and while I'm I mean direct hit you know yeah I mean I I think that I'm saying this only half tongue in cheek but I think.

More than a few of them we should hit there because that would that might help President Obama look.

Presidential which is entitled to look now in three in three important states are very had to -- difference in new York and New Jersey okay crowd.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions
Read more »

 
Great HTML Templates from easytemplates.com.